FAO Samnooshka or anybody good with Photoshop

[plowsie]

I know the image may be carp but can you please remove the watermark from this image for me please :) Its for work. Or if need be I will e-mail the original.

Ta very much :)

http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w46/plowsie/200810TheLongBarnHDRImage3110.jpg

[Richie]

Puff... It gone.

[the_lone_wolf]

http://i488.photobucket.com/albums/rr243/ktm_wolf/misc/200810TheLongBarnHDRImage3110.jpg

[DarrenSV650S]

http://i488.photobucket.com/albums/rr243/ktm_wolf/misc/200810TheLongBarnHDRImage3110.jpg:winner::smt038

[rictus01]

Er..... am I missing something here? sorry Stu but isn't that why watermarks are added in the first place*?, if it's for work then go back to source and get them to pay for the original :smt102,

bit like asking how to remove a vin plate or something if you ask me.

* to protect the intergrity of the original photographer

Cheers Mark.

[DarrenSV650S]

Plowsie is a clever man. His hands are clean
Richie and the lone wolf, you guys are in trouble:smt105

[Richie]

I went back there yesterday and took another photo for Stu... Sorry.

[Samnooshka]

The water mark is on there from an HDR program called photomatix... i have the official copy so if you want me to produce a copy like the one in the original post but without the watermark, them email it to me.

[Richie]

The water mark is on there from an HDR program called photomatix... i have the official copy so if you want me to produce a copy like the one in the original post but without the watermark, them email it to me.

Isn't she a STAR... :smt049

[Speedy Claire]

http://i488.photobucket.com/albums/rr243/ktm_wolf/misc/200810TheLongBarnHDRImage3110.jpg



PMSL :smt038

[plowsie]

The water mark is on there from an HDR program called photomatix... i have the official copy so if you want me to produce a copy like the one in the original post but without the watermark, them email it to me.
Thanks Sam but what Richie has done should be fine :)

The Lone Wolf - Lol :D

Rictus - I know mate, wondered if it is a bit naughty or not.

Richie - Thanks mate that will be fine :)

[Ed]

Agree with Rictus. Sorry Stu but this is a flagrant breach of copyright. Your work should cough up.

[plowsie]

Okay so it looks like its prob best to get the full version :) thanks guys :)

[stuartyboy]

Er guys....be very careful before you start plastering watermarked images online. All these stock photo vendors use visible watermarks as well as digital watermarks and you will be caught! We use digimarking in our work and you can be caught pretty much instantly (it works like the copyscape web service).

Dont think you'll get a slap on the wrist either. These companies go after individuals too - as in the young guy who used images from getty images for his cricket club and also John Weir Honda dealers who had a big fine.

https://www.digimarc.com/solutions/technology.asp#secure

[Samnooshka]

Yes, fair point, however, if you have an original copy of the program you can use that instead of the copy that Stu has posted. They put the watermark on there as they want you to buy the full version.