monkey
18-09-12, 10:01 PM
Ladies.
I currently have (in my kitchen and bathroom) two sets of Nissin front calipers from a 2000 Fireblade and a 2007 Daytona 675. I've had the pistons out to clean them up and check the seals.
Whilst finishing off the Fireblade items tonight I made quite a discovery: The Fireblade pistons appear to be made out of some sort of alloy, whilst the Daytona ones are made out of plated steel.
I got my scales out and weighed each complete set;
Fireblade= 170 grams
Daytona= 504 grams
I also observed that in each set of 8 pistons, all appear to be exactly the same size as the ones from the other bike (no vernier or micrometer to hand) but there are a few differences. The Blade items have a dished underside and the Daytona ones appear to be made from two pieces, one pressed into the other. Please see the picture below.
Daytona on the left, Fireblade on the right.
http://imageshack.us/a/img525/1635/pisth.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/525/pisth.jpg/)
It seems mental to me that a bike 7 years newer than the other has brake pistons weighing in at bang on 1/3kg more than the older one, when it's all about keeping weight, and especially unsprung weight, to a minimum. Also the Triumph ones will pit in time (and already have) whereas the Honda ones won't.
Question time:
1) What's with the dishing on the Fireblade pistons?
2) What's with the line on the Daytona pistons (possibly two parts methinks)?
3) Why (apart from slight monetary issues) would Triumph use the steel pistons?
Clever people unite and discuss.
:smt061
I currently have (in my kitchen and bathroom) two sets of Nissin front calipers from a 2000 Fireblade and a 2007 Daytona 675. I've had the pistons out to clean them up and check the seals.
Whilst finishing off the Fireblade items tonight I made quite a discovery: The Fireblade pistons appear to be made out of some sort of alloy, whilst the Daytona ones are made out of plated steel.
I got my scales out and weighed each complete set;
Fireblade= 170 grams
Daytona= 504 grams
I also observed that in each set of 8 pistons, all appear to be exactly the same size as the ones from the other bike (no vernier or micrometer to hand) but there are a few differences. The Blade items have a dished underside and the Daytona ones appear to be made from two pieces, one pressed into the other. Please see the picture below.
Daytona on the left, Fireblade on the right.
http://imageshack.us/a/img525/1635/pisth.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/525/pisth.jpg/)
It seems mental to me that a bike 7 years newer than the other has brake pistons weighing in at bang on 1/3kg more than the older one, when it's all about keeping weight, and especially unsprung weight, to a minimum. Also the Triumph ones will pit in time (and already have) whereas the Honda ones won't.
Question time:
1) What's with the dishing on the Fireblade pistons?
2) What's with the line on the Daytona pistons (possibly two parts methinks)?
3) Why (apart from slight monetary issues) would Triumph use the steel pistons?
Clever people unite and discuss.
:smt061