Log in

View Full Version : Transport Sanction Credit Adjustment.


Thunderace
12-10-12, 09:01 PM
TSCA From now on will be awarded/deducted however the Transport Minister sees fit,

Such sanctions will take place due to thread derailment (thus making it a tad more difficult to decipher when, where a rideout is taking place and who is turning up).

Also making excuses as to no shows at Cabinet Meetings/rideouts/BBQ's, such excuses will be assessed by the Transport Minister and credits will be unchanged or deducted accordingly.

No whinging or more sanctions will be levied!

No TSCA can be credited or deducted by any other Cabinet Member!

Organising Annexation recce's, depending on results will result in substantial TSCA.

Dear Minister for Administrative Affairs,

Before awarding any TSCA I wish to know if your department is happy to collate the credits for TSCA or is it going to be left to the Transport Minister?

Yours Faithfully,

Transport Minister.

Spank86
12-10-12, 10:03 PM
This seems to overlap with sustainability credits, it might need discussion at the next cabinet meeting but in principal I'm happy to take on any administrative duty.

Fallout
13-10-12, 08:26 AM
This seems to overlap with sustainability credits, it might need discussion at the next cabinet meeting but in principal I'm happy to take on any administrative duty.

Yes, it does. It's clearly just Nathan's way of telling people off for things that bug him. :rolleyes:

Thunderace
13-10-12, 08:29 AM
It does not overlap see post 5......

http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=183459

TSCA is solely a Transport Issue, don't panic too much about tracking not many will be awarded.........anywhoo back to work.

TSCA:

Andrewsmith -25 for constant thread derailment, and generally being a tit!
Littlepeahead -2 far too happy to derail threads at a whim.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 08:30 AM
Yes, it does. It's clearly just Nathan's way of telling people off for things that bug him. :rolleyes:

Does it really? Read that!:smt019

http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=183459

Mark_h
13-10-12, 08:49 AM
TSCA From now on will be awarded/deducted however the Transport Minister sees fit,

Such sanctions will take place due to thread derailment (thus making it a tad more difficult to decipher when, where a rideout is taking place and who is turning up).

Also making excuses as to no shows at Cabinet Meetings/rideouts/BBQ's, such excuses will be assessed by the Transport Minister and credits will be unchanged or deducted accordingly.

No whinging or more sanctions will be levied!

No TSCA can be credited or deducted by any other Cabinet Member!

Organising Annexation recce's, depending on results will result in substantial TSCA.

Dear Minister for Administrative Affairs,

Before awarding any TSCA I wish to know if your department is happy to collate the credits for TSCA or is it going to be left to the Transport Minister?

Yours Faithfully,

Transport Minister.

Not required. Existing credit regime more than adequate. All citizens welcome to make GMCA recommendations which will be processed by my Automated Reviewing Sustainability Engine for validity and formally applied as necessary.

Open for debate and I'll go with majority view but my recommendation is NOT REQUIRED.

Fallout
13-10-12, 08:53 AM
This could get messy. Thunderace is probably bullying someone out of frustration as we speak.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 08:57 AM
Not required. Existing credit regime more than adequate. All citizens welcome to make GMCA recommendations which will be processed by my Automated Reviewing Sustainability Engine for validity and formally applied as necessary.

Open for debate and I'll go with majority view but my recommendation is NOT REQUIRED.

Read the OP.

Mark_h -1 for whinging.

Spank86
13-10-12, 09:07 AM
This could get messy. Thunderace is probably bullying someone out of frustration as we speak.

Jammy for instance?

Thunderace
13-10-12, 09:08 AM
Not required. Existing credit regime more than adequate. All citizens welcome to make GMCA recommendations which will be processed by my Automated Reviewing Sustainability Engine for validity and formally applied as necessary.

Open for debate and I'll go with majority view but my recommendation is NOT REQUIRED.

The existing regime is not adequate the Minister changes the rules to accommodate his credit allocations at will, as soon as this is corrected TSCA will cease.

For example introducing ROCA was fine for the Minister to dish out credits for good attendance as soon as someone else does it apparently is no longer the way it is done, thus TSCA has been introduced to not reward for good attendance but to punish for lack of attendance, if in doubt refer to OP.

Unlike GMCA & ROCA, TSCA is not up for debate and the rules will not change as and when I see fit. For rules see OP.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 09:08 AM
Jammy for instance?

He needs it the wet fart!:smt019

Thunderace
13-10-12, 09:15 AM
Be warned gents there is a Rideout/BBQ at the end of the month, 3 of you have made excuses already, 2 of which are deemed valid though disappointing, 1 however is under TSCA investigation, if further evidence for the validity of said absence is not provided prior to the Rideout/BBQ severe TSCA will be awarded.

Mark_h
13-10-12, 11:33 AM
The existing regime is not adequate the Minister changes the rules to accommodate his credit allocations at will, as soon as this is corrected TSCA will cease.

For example introducing ROCA was fine for the Minister to dish out credits for good attendance as soon as someone else does it apparently is no longer the way it is done, thus TSCA has been introduced to not reward for good attendance but to punish for lack of attendance, if in doubt refer to OP.

Unlike GMCA & ROCA, TSCA is not up for debate and the rules will not change as and when I see fit. For rules see OP.

Back in yer box. Go clean some catseyes or polish some white lines or something. Oh and get yourself some B6 and evening primrose oil, seems you may benefit.

ROCAS have always been a way of rewarding ride attendance and penalising those who say they are going to attend then whine, moan and fail to turn up anyway or Boardteaing as it's otherwise known. Not turning up when you never said you were going to turn up is acceptable to a point. However persistent non-attendance by cabinet members (MOS included) should be reported to MOS for investigation and, where appropriate, credit penalty.

ROCA awards have never been challenged by MOS so far as I know. However some have been allocated with little content (TA) to justify where as those by MOS and Fallout are more in keeping with expectations.

ROCAs being used as a mechanism to penalise rebels and the like is inappropriate use of credit system and has been challenged. Correct practice is to see MOS with a recommendation.

GMCA, ROCA and SPAM rules have been refined as required. I am confident the initial intent has been maintained throughout and any insinuation of preference to MOS is clearly unfounded given MOS is not leading the credit ratings and I do not believe any MOS to MOS credit has ever been challenged.

Does anyone else* feel aggrieved? El-presidento seems to have had a bit of a rough ride recently but with high office comes high expectation and this does seem to be correcting itself.

If you want a punative release mechanism may I suggest you pop over to Essex from time to time and see if MOC can assist by either dishing out punishment or some JBA to calm you.

Lets stop all this talk of vigilante points, intra-empire violence and general nastiness. This is not the way of the empire. Peace and love man... peace and love.

Oh and sort those speed bumps out. No wonder the pink ace is disassembling it's frock if it has to negotiate those on a regular basis.


*Opinions of rebels, deserters and girly-wooftas don't count.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 01:50 PM
Back in yer box. Go clean some catseyes or polish some white lines or something. Oh and get yourself some B6 and evening primrose oil, seems you may benefit.

ROCAS have always been a way of rewarding ride attendance and penalising those who say they are going to attend then whine, moan and fail to turn up anyway or Boardteaing as it's otherwise known. Not turning up when you never said you were going to turn up is acceptable to a point. However persistent non-attendance by cabinet members (MOS included) should be reported to MOS for investigation and, where appropriate, credit penalty.

ROCA awards have never been challenged by MOS so far as I know. However some have been allocated with little content (TA) to justify where as those by MOS and Fallout are more in keeping with expectations.

ROCAs being used as a mechanism to penalise rebels and the like is inappropriate use of credit system and has been challenged. Correct practice is to see MOS with a recommendation.

GMCA, ROCA and SPAM rules have been refined as required. I am confident the initial intent has been maintained throughout and any insinuation of preference to MOS is clearly unfounded given MOS is not leading the credit ratings and I do not believe any MOS to MOS credit has ever been challenged.

Does anyone else* feel aggrieved? El-presidento seems to have had a bit of a rough ride recently but with high office comes high expectation and this does seem to be correcting itself.

If you want a punative release mechanism may I suggest you pop over to Essex from time to time and see if MOC can assist by either dishing out punishment or some JBA to calm you.

Lets stop all this talk of vigilante points, intra-empire violence and general nastiness. This is not the way of the empire. Peace and love man... peace and love.

Oh and sort those speed bumps out. No wonder the pink ace is disassembling it's frock if it has to negotiate those on a regular basis.


*Opinions of rebels, deserters and girly-wooftas don't count.

If nowt of note happens on a rideout, attendance is all you're left with!

With regard to TSCA, as previously stated "not up for debate" if in doubt see OP. No more whinging or there will be further TSCA, TSCA will be a tool with which the Transport Ministry can ensure orderly organisation of transport related activity, and people who are deemed to interfere/derail any such organisational attempts will recieve TSCA.

Oh yes don't mean to labour the point but it seems folks are struggling with this one, whinging about TSCA = receiving TSCA.

DJ123
13-10-12, 02:10 PM
stuff always happens on a ride out.
You get/lose points for;
attending/not
leading
TEC
tom-foolery
daftness
having fun

Thunderace
13-10-12, 02:12 PM
stuff always happens on a ride out.
You get/lose points for;
attending/not
leading
TEC
tom-foolery
daftness
having fun

We have had quite a few rides with not much occurring!

And stop whinging or TSCA!:smt019

DJ123
13-10-12, 02:13 PM
A) i'm not whinging, simply pointing out the obvious

B) This very much appears like you've got PMT ;)

Thunderace
13-10-12, 02:17 PM
A) i'm not whinging, simply pointing out the obvious

B) This very much appears like you've got PMT ;)

TSCA:

daddyjob -1 for whinging.

TSCA is not up for debate! If in doubt see OP.

The Idle Biker
13-10-12, 02:22 PM
Wtf are all these acronyms? ? ?

Thunderace
13-10-12, 02:22 PM
Beware as stated before TSCA will be rare as long as there is no whinging about TSCA.

Mostly TSCA is an anti derailment device.

Spank86
13-10-12, 03:45 PM
Wtf are all these acronyms? ? ?

TSCA

Thunderaces Sulky Credit Adjustments

Sir Trev
13-10-12, 04:42 PM
Very soon you numpties are going to require your own version of the civil service to keep track of all this points nonsence. Good luck with the red tape of all that and the creeping sense of hopelessness when you want to update or change something and find you can't, because they've become unionised and you've not filled in the right form...

Spank86
13-10-12, 04:58 PM
That would be my job trev.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 06:04 PM
TSCA

Thunderaces Sulky Credit Adjustments

TSCA:

Spank86 -1 for whinging.
Sir Trev -1 for same thing.

Spank86
13-10-12, 06:23 PM
Shouldn't that be:

TSCA

Spank86 -1 for pointing out thunderaces whinging?

Thunderace
13-10-12, 06:27 PM
Shouldn't that be:

TSCA

Spank86 -1 for pointing out thunderaces whinging?

Nope I have not whinged about TSCA at all!

TSCA:

Spank86 -2 incessant whinging.

First rule of TSCA, you don't whinge about TSCA!

Spank86
13-10-12, 06:30 PM
Are you confusing mocking with whinging?

Thunderace
13-10-12, 06:33 PM
Are you confusing mocking with whinging?

In the Transport Department we feel the term whinging is just flexible enough in definition for the Minister to be able to term most if not all descent pertaining to TSCA as whinging so don't do it!

Spank86
13-10-12, 06:35 PM
Well, I'd best try not to be so down on it then.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 06:41 PM
Well, I'd best try not to be so down on it then.

That's the spirit!

TSCA:

Spank86 +2 for finally getting it!:smt040

Spank86
13-10-12, 06:43 PM
I knew I should have emphasised the word down.

Thunderace
13-10-12, 07:09 PM
I knew I should have emphasised the word down.

Easy tiger!;)

Sir Trev
14-10-12, 03:12 PM
Are you confusing mocking with whinging?

To avoid ALL confusion I'd like to point out I was specifically MOCKING.

Runako
14-10-12, 06:23 PM
In the Transport Department we feel the term whinging is just flexible enough in definition for the Minister to be able to term most if not all dissent pertaining to TSCA as whinging so don't do it!

Corrected for you