PDA

View Full Version : West London Yamaha


allantheboss
23-03-13, 04:54 PM
I feel this info is due before someone else falls into their traps.

I will put it in brief. I bought a "new" XJR1300 from them in June 2012, £8000 reduced from £9500. I kept asking all the salesmen why it was cheap, and the excuse they repeatedly gave me was that they get given bikes by Yamaha to sell. If they don't sell the bikes after 6 months, they must pay Yamaha for the bikes and are still burdened with selling them on to the public. This XJR had hence allegedly been sat in the showroom for almost 6 months and they wanted to get rid of it because otherwise they'd have to pay Yamaha for the bike, and still have it in their showroom.

I squeezed for more, but they weren't giving me any more reasons why. I accepted, and purchased this "2012" bike.

After a few months I eventually noticed online that the 2012 XJRs didn't have my own bike's pain scheme. Neither did the 2013 bikes. Neither did the 2011 bikes. However, the 2010 XJR1300s did have my paint scheme.

West London Yamaha sold me a 2010 bike, with a 2012 plate, and had been lying to me the entire time until purchase, telling me it was a 2012 bike. I contacted them trying to remain as kind and reasonable as possible, only to have them telling me "I'm sure you would have been told" (well chaps, I would either be happy with a 2010 bike for £8000 and buy it, or not! I wouldn't come back complaining if I already knew). I refuted all their silly excuses until it boiled down to their last, final bout as to why I should have known it was a 2010 bike. "It says it's a 2010 bike on your invoice". Here it is:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/r270/431596_10151310605065614_272913070_n.jpg

See the "10"? Apparently, that is how I'm meant to know that the bike I was told is a 2012 model, is actually 2010. Ignore the label on the bike in the showroom which advertised it as "2012". Ignore the salesman standing next to me constantly telling me about the brand-new "2012" bike and specifications. I can tell you all that discovering this after giving them £8000 which I earnt on top of University studies, working at £6 per hour, is excruciatingly upsetting. This "10" was the only thing meant to wholly make me aware it was secretly a 2010 bike I was buying.
Their final comments stood along the lines of "well, what do you want us to do about it?" to which I can't see me getting anywhere.

Yamaha customer services themselves showed no sympathy, telling me they "know the guys at West London Yamaha" and almost politely told me they don't give a ****. I made several calls to Yamaha customer services and felt like a powerless piece of sh*t with no leg to stand on every time.


As if that wasn't enough. Before all this emerged, on the day that I was picking-up my bike, I had to sign and complete the usual paperwork. Unfortunately for the salesman, I actually read the paperwork. He handed me a paper, and literally said, word for word: "And sign this to say that you've seen it". "What? Sign to say I've seen a piece of paper?". "Yes Sir, just sign at the bottom to say you've seen it". I proceeded to examine the page, which turned out to be the pre-delivery checklist. Things like testing suspension, making sure all electronics are working, check the tyre pressures are correct, fill the engine with oil, check the brakes et cetera. To my amazement, every box was ticked, all the way to the final "Pre-delivery test drive completed", where the dealer takes the bike out for a few miles to make sure everything works and the bike is road-worthy. Now, this would be fine, except, he had not taken the bike out. Nor had the bike had half of the checks done- it was still in the garage, having the checks completed.

Again, to cut a long story short; I refused to sign until he at least did the test-ride for me. He rolled his eyes, left to wait in the garage until they were finished with the other checks, did the ride, and came back inciting me to sign. Their reasoning was that "the mechanic had been there for over 10 years and knew what he was doing". So what? Even if you're going to lie and not properly complete the checklist in order, at least wait until you're finished to tell me to sign! I asked before I came to pick up if the Ohlins suspension on the bike could be tweaked for someone of 90kg. I had to ask thrice more in person before it was done. When finally on the bike, ready to drive away, the clutch lever was angled differently to the brake lever. I asked for this to be adjusted, the mechanic came outside and corrected it, and when I thanked him, he rolled his eyes, sighed, and walked back in without looking at me.

So, needless to say, it was the worst purchase of my life, and the most upsetting experience I've ever had when buying something. Please just take this as a word of warning. Spread this as much as you like. I don't know how long they've been treating customers like this, but they should not be allowed to continue. I definitely will encourage people to never use that dealership, and will never buy anything from Yamaha every again. I hope you all do the same so perhaps they'll realise none of this is acceptable.

DJ123
23-03-13, 04:58 PM
It is a 10 model registered in 2012, so it is a '12 registered bike. Did you not HPI check it prior to buying it?

Spank86
23-03-13, 05:45 PM
Is there a difference between the 10s and the 12s?

Sir Trev
23-03-13, 06:12 PM
Is there a difference between the 10s and the 12s?

In value, yes. You also have the concern that an engine that has not been turned over for two years may have dried out seals that may fail sooner than expected. Resale-wise it's a 2010 model year and also worth a bit less as a consequence.

In terms of HPI it's not usual to do one for brand new vehicles. Their use is mainly to see if there has been accident damage or outstanding finance.

Allan - go and have a chat with your local CAB.

Biker Biggles
23-03-13, 06:28 PM
Yes CAB and trading standards.I suspect they will back you up and you could take the case all the way.
I have bought two new bikes and never HPId them.I doubt many people would and it would not be deemed reasonable in law to need to HPI a new vehicle.These sharp practices are still rife in the motorcycle selling world,just like they used to be in car sales.The new car market had to clean up its act due to public pressure but it seems action is still needed among bike retailers.Id go for my money back in full.

Redmist
23-03-13, 06:45 PM
I sympathise with the situation BUT just proves, it it sounds too good to be true....

Spank86
23-03-13, 08:38 PM
In value, yes. You also have the concern that an engine that has not been turned over for two years may have dried out seals that may fail sooner than expected. Resale-wise it's a 2010 model year and also worth a bit less as a consequence.

I mean an actual change.

Biker Biggles
23-03-13, 08:52 PM
Bottom line is they misrepresented the goods,knowing full well what they were doing,and knowing full well the buyer probably would not know that the goods were not what they seemed to be.Now if this had been a bank selling payment protection,or an insurance company selling inappropriate ill health cover there would be a scandal followed by full repayments.Why not the same for a cowboy Yamaha dealer?

Runako
23-03-13, 09:50 PM
As BB said, and you should have taken legal advice. In fact you still can if you want to pursue it as you have 6 years in which to make a claim. Either contact Trading Standards or send me a PM, although I suspect you intend to chalk this one up to a bad experience.

Runako
23-03-13, 09:53 PM
Id go for my money back in full.

Not entitled to money back in full (technical reasons) but is entitled to the (perceived) difference in value.

Sir Trev
24-03-13, 04:28 PM
I mean an actual change.


I'd guessed that. But as he had the chance to look it over and effectively confirm he was happy with the physical condition I don't think that will be the main issue here.

Keep us posted Allan as we've all probably come across something similar before. For me it was a "full service history" car that was nothing of the sort and a "one previous owner" that did not mention it was a pre-reg by the delaer, making me owner number three, not two.

Grant66
24-03-13, 07:41 PM
For me it was a "full service history" car that was nothing of the sort and a "one previous owner" that did not mention it was a pre-reg by the delaer, making me owner number three, not two.

Reg Vardy once tried to sell me a car with one previous owner, tried their best to stop me seeing the V5. The one previous owner...Eurocar

Sorry to sound negative but doesnt this fall under "buyer beware".

Grant66
24-03-13, 07:49 PM
Forget that. You asked and they lied.

Runako
24-03-13, 08:26 PM
Buyer beware doesn't apply to retail purchases (consumer - trader) only in private to private or auction purchases.

Sir Trev
25-03-13, 09:31 AM
Reg Vardy once tried to sell me a car with one previous owner, tried their best to stop me seeing the V5. The one previous owner...Eurocar



Chain dealers often claim not have the V5/service book in the local branch. I insist on seeing the docs now before I buy or I walk away.