![]() |
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
I noticed a while back whilst moving somewhat quickly an unmarked plod with hair dryer, he was struggling to put it turn it round to get my plate so wacked it open an got out of there.
There is something to be said for increasing your speed before they can react |
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Quote:
|
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Quote:
Regards postage, it is exactly as I posted above, it should be sent in time to arrive within 14 days, so in the opinion of my lawyer who dealt with my DWDC case, that means on day 12 at the latest. Quote:
Quote:
Postage: Should be within about 12 days if the rules are followed, but actually it doesn't matter a toss in terms of the validity of your NIP and your not going to win anything by arguing the toss over it. Validity: Look at the Issue date on the NIP. Quote:
Quote:
That means filling in the NIP, THEN (in the case of speeding, may not apply to other offences) asking them to provide a copy of the original dated within the 14 days. How do you prove somebody didn't just back date that copy? You can't, you just have to trust that the police are not being crooks themselves and tampering with evidence. Your right that it's not an easy system to win against, but it's not impossible. For instance if you receive an NIP after 20 days, which is dated after 18 days, so long as the 14 day rule applies to that offence, you should be onto a winner. |
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
BTW, it's all well and good us posting this on here, but the law is so intricate that even the police don't fully understand the intricacies of it as they are not experts in prosecuting or defending in court.
It actually doesn't matter what the letter of the law says, it only matters how the court interprets the letter of the law, so you can't read it for yourself and draw a correct conclusion. If you are going to fight the system, with regard to the 14 day rule (ie: rejecting yourself on basis of time barred has failed) or anything else, get yourself a motoring lawyer, don't try to understand it yourself or do it alone. They are in and out of court every day dealing with motoring offences, and they are the only ones who can really tell you where you stand in your particular circumstances. In the case of speeding it'd only be worth really fighting it, if you were caught at silly speed, and you are facing a massive fine, and a ban which may affect your livelihood. |
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Still nothing......
|
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Guess you is off the hook, lucky boy
|
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
I've been following this with interest but just noticed in your first post you said you went past a camera van, I thought camera vans had forward facing cameras and therefore wouldn't see your plate?
|
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Quote:
|
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Quote:
Quote:
It also depends which way you go past the camera. There's one location round here where they park in a layby at the top of the hill so they can get the forward facing cars overtaking the lorries in the crawler lane up the hill, and can also get the cars and bikes going downhill away from them. You never know which they are looking at (this one wasn't at that location though). |
Re: NIP not here after 19 days is it....
Speeding is an offence that requires the offender to be informed of a potential prosecution within 14 days of the alleged incident. If the police don't stop you at the time and tell you so then they need to serve a "Notice of Intended Prosecution" on the registered keeper within 14 days. As Ralph says they need to show that they sent one and that it should have reasonably arrived within the 14 days for a prosecution to succeed.
Along with, but separate to, the NIP, the police will send a Sect 172 notice to the registered keeper requiring them to provide details of who the driver was at the time of the alleged offence. This is a separate power, and it's an offence to fail to comply with it without good cause. If you don't comply with this then you get prosecuted for failing to provide details, which is what happened to Lozzo. They can't prosecute you for the speeding because they don't know who the driver/rider was, but the courts aren't stupid so expect the sentence to reflect that.... If the NIP and Sect 172 arrive late then fill in the 172 and send it back with a note, as Ralph says, saying you were the rider at the time but as they haven't complied with the rules you don't expect to hear from them again. Best of luck, but it sounds like you won't be needing it. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.