![]() |
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
|
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
That is live.
what about highlights? Show race again next day? |
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
|
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
|
Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
No that sounds like a good idea. Sent down the wires from home |
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
So if there's a biker pub within 8 miles of where you live, which you know will be showing MotoGP, and is open at 9am, or 2am for the flyaway rounds in the far east, and you don't mind riding or driving there in whatever weather mother nature throws at you that weekend, and you don't have something else on that weekend which stops you watching the event live, then you're sorted. For the rest of us, £83 may not look like such a bad deal. |
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
For what you are get, £83 is a bargain...a 'steal' even...
|
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
For me that is a lot of money considering I had it for free for the last 15 or so years. I started watching MotoGP back in the 500cc days when it was shown on Channel 5 and then when it moved to the BBC. I have Sky here and have been enjoying the fuller coverage on Eurosport that I get included in my package. But for the main race I've always gone for the BBC which is paid for in my TV Licence. So the basic question is what more am I getting for my £83 that I wasn't getting from the BBC? |
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
Quote:
You have three choices: Pay BT (whether directly, for a broadband package, or indirectly via Virgin), pay Dorna (via motogp.com), or don't watch the races. If you don't like those options, complain to Dorna. They're the ones who decided to sell the UK rights to a subscription-only provider. BBC, Channel 5 and Eurosport (who are also a subscription-only provider, remember) are irrelevant as of last November. |
Re: Non-BT MotoGP coverage
There is a 4th option as has been previously suggested, that of some sort of streaming site. Excluding the legal and or moral questions however.
Yes the BBC will no longer have it but the question remains valid. I previously paid for the coverage via the licence fee and in the grand scheme of things, that would have been a very small amount. But lets call it £1. Now I am being asked to pay 83 times more than I did before. I'm just wondering if the coverage will be 83 times better? If its not better and I would guess its going to be about the same I'm left questioning the value of it. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.