![]() |
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
Quote:
|
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
The blade would be faster in a straight line and on public roads. On the track would come down to rider preference, all things else being equal. Hard to tell what my preference would be, a trackday and a set of lap times for each bike would be the best way to tell.
|
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
Quote:
what is it they say about hero's and meeting them......? |
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
i think i may look at test riding a SP1
i could just see if my mate wants to swap for a bit, but i would be a worried as its not mine |
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
So the blade is lighter and makes more power
The SP1 has a power delivery that allows you to get on the throttle earlier and drive the bike out the corner. When they let Litre IL4's race Twins in Superbikes the 4's whooped the a*rse of the twin until Ducati squealed so much they got a capacity upgrade. Is there an argument that the SP1 is to track focused to make a good roadbike ? I think the SP1 would have out of and into corners, but on something more sweeping I reckon the blade would be reiging the SP1 back in again... |
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
whats the 0-60 on both bikes
|
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
Quote:
|
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
Quote:
The IL4's ruled on track because of the outright power advantage I think. Bayliss was still doing the business on the 999 wasn't he? The V-twin was still a usable package on the track, except on the straight bits. |
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
Quote:
-3 secs |
Re: Blade Vs Sp1
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.