![]() |
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Quote:
Also, if it was so easy to hop on GP bike and be competitive because of the aids, then why is it that whenever they let the journos have a play at the end of the season, they are a country mile off the times that the racers put down!? |
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
There's also a fairly long list of top notch Superbike riders that have arrived in Moto GP and not exactly shone..... even Spies who has got to be one of the quickest learners out there has taken his time to get dialed in.
|
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Quote:
As I said earlier, the rider is now the weak point and that is highlighted by the face a journo can't do it. On its own the bike could outride a journo. C |
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Quote:
The rider is part of the equation, not an optional component. Its the essence of motorcycle racing. At some point the level of rider aids will be pegged back again, thats just part of the cycle (no pun intended :-) ). Its funny though, no matter what they seem to do, the best riders always seem to be at or near the front. |
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Bang them all on 20 year old 400cc screamers for a 10 lap race.. I'd love to see that
|
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Can't do that Stretchie. that would be called "Racing".
People might PASS each other! There might be Elbow to Elbow dicing and Exciting action. I can't see anyone going for that when we have it so good now ;) |
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Whatever the electronics are like at the moment, it doesn't change the fact that you still have to be an exceptional rider to ride one properly fast.
I do agree that it would be more entertaining without, and with tyres that liked being spun a bit more too, but I think the same people would be at the front. |
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Quote:
|
Re: Riders? Who needs them?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.