Re: why, simply why
 

Wow. That is fugly. Really fugly. The f word, obviously, being "functional". As in, it's really fu(nctional but you wouldn't want to be seen in the same county, let alone riding the bike because it's so damn u)gly

Re: why, simply why
 

aaaaaaaaaaaaargh


argh
aaaaaarghh

http://media1.break.com/breakstudios...-mars-face.jpg

Re: why, simply why
 

Considering what I ride, I'm not in any position to comment on the aesthetic qualities of the fairing in question. However... some of you should really take a look at your reflections before passing comment on what looks good or is pleasing to the eye. Also, someone has pointed out that the fairing is functional and does a good job of what it was designed for, another thing some of you need to look a little closer to home and assess.

Just saying :-)

Re: why, simply why
 

Lozzo, you're missing the point. For us aesthetically-challenged individuals, the last thing we want is to add to the problem by riding something that looks like somebody has punched it's face. Repeatedly.

Re: why, simply why
 

No, no and again no.

Us aesthetically challenged people should totally relate to this bike and thank the deity of our choice for one thing; when we stand next to a fugly bike WE are the ones who look good. Wtf do you think I bought a Versys?

Re: why, simply why
 

I stand corrected. Your Versys is worse!

Re: why, simply why
 

remember the 80-90's most bikes look like this but were all the rage.

Re: why, simply why
 

but would you ( if of course you were the skum of the earth) nick the damn thing

Re: why, simply why
 

No more than I would a Reliant Robin!

Re: why, simply why
 

but would you nick a Robin