SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum

SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum (http://forums.sv650.org/index.php)
-   Bikes - Talk & Issues (http://forums.sv650.org/forumdisplay.php?f=129)
-   -   Inline 4s (http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=158620)

rob13 12-10-10 07:32 AM

Inline 4s
 
What is it with them? You either love them or you don't. Granted I've only been on 5 il4s but everyone just felt bland. On the other hand every twin or triple I've been on has at least had character even if i didnt particularly like the bike

fizzwheel 12-10-10 07:46 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
All the IL$'s I've ridden havent been bland, even the sheddy Bandit 600 I got give as a courtesy bike. The trick is to find where in the rev range the "Character" is.

The just need approaching with a different mindset, if you ride a 4 like a twin, its never going to be any fun. But then life would be boring if we all liked the same thing wouldnt it.

muffles 12-10-10 07:53 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
What do you mean by character? Any better way you can define it?

If I had to interpret that I'd say it was the acceleration (I guess...assuming you aren't talking about the sound, what else can the engine give). And yep, that's in a different place on an IL4 so....

Quote:

Originally Posted by fizzwheel (Post 2391321)
if you ride a 4 like a twin, its never going to be any fun.

...is right IMO. That nutty top end rush on an IL4 can be quite addictive!

By comparison, my last ride on a twin left me feeling bored and soul-less (it was a K7 SV650S, standard). Half of that was the fact it felt wheezy and gutless (but then I was riding it at 5k+ all the time, naughty naughty) and the other half was the fact it had a standard exhaust and so I couldn't even get a nice sound out of it...

STRAMASHER 12-10-10 08:10 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
More difficult to ride and ride well than a "equivelent" 4.

Low frequency vibes (man:smt033)

Uncommon sound.

Instant punt.




I'm no IL4 hater, having owned 3 (400,600,1400) and 4 twins too. Its just for me, you know exactly what you are going to get from a four. From 400cc - Litre+. Impressive and easy but a little uninspiring.

Solution? Have more than one bike unless you are a serial changer.

simesb 12-10-10 08:18 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robchester (Post 2391312)
On the other hand every twin or triple I've been on has at least had character even if i didnt particularly like the bike

If by character you mean exhaust note, then I guess most people will prefer the v-twin (on here at least ;)). Personally, I find the constant demand of the engine to rev it harder and harder more enticing than the lazy application of torque. But that doesn't mean that IL4s aren't perfectly tractable at low revs - just a different noise.

simesb 12-10-10 08:26 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtyLady (Post 2391341)
Hate IL4s

Because?

Tim in Belgium 12-10-10 08:39 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
I've liked 1s, twins and IL4s so far, all are good but different.

mikerj 12-10-10 08:40 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
I'm not a big fan of IL4's in general, they just sound so bland unless you are screwing the bits of them. Odd numbers of cylinders sound the best, give me a triple or a 5 cylinder(for a car) engine any day, closely followed by a V twin.

simesb 12-10-10 08:43 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtyLady (Post 2391357)
Don't know just do :mrgreen:

Hate is a fairly strong word. I could understand it if you didn't like the exhaust noise, or if you just prefer riding at lower revs, but to hate something for no reason is fairly dumb. :confused:

Reeder 12-10-10 08:50 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
I actually prefer the noise of an IL4 :smt097












8-[

Milky Bar Kid 12-10-10 08:58 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Much prefer the burble of the twin but I love my IL4! When you get in that powerband its awesome!

SoulKiss 12-10-10 09:01 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid (Post 2391388)
Much prefer the burble of the twin but I love my IL4! When you get in that powerband its awesome!

You still using the stock white powerband (or is it red on your bike, I cant remember off the top of my head)

You really should upgrade to a blue or black one ASAP

dizzyblonde 12-10-10 09:01 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
I love Vtwins. I don't like IL4s.

I like the 'bus' though, but thats because its big and fast, and belongs to Peg, so I'm biased.

Milky Bar Kid 12-10-10 09:02 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulKiss (Post 2391397)
You still using the stock white powerband (or is it red on your bike, I cant remember off the top of my head)

You really should upgrade to a blue or black one ASAP

I shall presume you are extracting the urine here......

Dicky Ticker 12-10-10 09:08 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
"Powerband" is that the same as "Go Faster Stripes" or is it something different?:D

ArtyLady 12-10-10 09:09 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dicky Ticker (Post 2391415)
"Powerband" is that the same as "Go Faster Stripes" or is it something different?:D

:lol:

SoulKiss 12-10-10 09:13 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid (Post 2391401)
I shall presume you are extracting the urine here......

Would I?

Milky Bar Kid 12-10-10 09:20 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
What's wrong with saying powerband???? The powerband is at the top of the rev range??? Me confuzzled!

warrenhewitt10 12-10-10 09:20 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
my next bike will probably be an inline 4, r6 or the likes, ill admit the sv sounds much nicer low down, and much nicer throughout how you would use it normally on the roads, but for the odd rake the scream of the i4 is fantastic. Dont really like the sound of the sv at really high revs.

Only i4 ive driven properly was my mates cbr600rr, and good god that was an experience

BBadger 12-10-10 09:29 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Another fan of the twin or single but only because every 4 ive ridden i never got a good enough go to get comfortable with it....also i own a twin and single and love that instant pull from the word go.

timwilky 12-10-10 09:34 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Yeah, V twins have some interesting characteristics. However, I think that whilst I only have a single bike, it will remain an IL4. Just need to justify 150 more cc.

The thing is you can have a gutless il4, or a ferkin hell il4. the same with V twins, you have the gutless SV650 70ish BHP or 130bhp sp2

SoulKiss 12-10-10 09:37 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid (Post 2391443)
What's wrong with saying powerband???? The powerband is at the top of the rev range??? Me confuzzled!

A VERY informative article on Powerbands.

http://www.planetash.net/gos/powerbands.html

Milky Bar Kid 12-10-10 09:40 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
That is awesome SK! I especially like the script about a pink powerband!

muffles 12-10-10 10:24 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Interesting comment that always comes up about the instant shove you get with twins - cos it doesn't always apply so much higher up the rev range, e.g. you could say that when comparing the SV at 3k, but comparing it at 8k...hmm, well it would be blown away by the 'instant shove' of my 750 (or my 600) at 8k.

I don't think either are more difficult to ride/ride well, just that they need different styles.

mikerj 12-10-10 10:47 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muffles (Post 2391504)
Interesting comment that always comes up about the instant shove you get with twins - cos it doesn't always apply so much higher up the rev range, e.g. you could say that when comparing the SV at 3k, but comparing it at 8k...hmm, well it would be blown away by the 'instant shove' of my 750 (or my 600) at 8k.

You miss the point, if both were burbling along at 3k then you would need to drop a gear or two to get your 600 up to 8k. It's no longer instant shove.

muffles 12-10-10 10:55 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikerj (Post 2391521)
You miss the point, if both were burbling along at 3k then you would need to drop a gear or two to get your 600 up to 8k. It's no longer instant shove.

No that's exactly my point, what if you were hammering it along at 8k - the twin can't compete (when compared to an IL4). It's no longer instant shove (for the twin).

muffles 12-10-10 10:57 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
I realise I may not have been clear btw - I am talking about *both* bikes being at 8k.

simesb 12-10-10 11:20 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikerj (Post 2391521)
You miss the point, if both were burbling along at 3k then you would need to drop a gear or two to get your 600 up to 8k. It's no longer instant shove.

Except on the IL4 you might well be burbling along at 5 or 6k. 6k feels like low revs in the same way as 3k might on the SV.

STRAMASHER 12-10-10 11:27 AM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muffles (Post 2391504)

I don't think either are more difficult to ride/ride well, just that they need different styles.

I have found riding in wet/icy/snow I prefer the soft delivery low down (ie not cutting about like Rossi) of a il4 compared to a twin.
Better throttle and clutch control required on a twin than a 4, harder to ride.

Cutting about like Rossi on a twin you need to know what you are doing if attempting to drop through the gears. I have never had a 4 try to lock up on me. Harder to ride well.
Slipper clutches/back-torque limiters are making it easier for us mechanically unsymapthetic dullards, but they make feck all difference in the slippy shicht.

I think you find out a lot about your bikes "character" in not dry conditions. Trying to be safe n' smooth, y'kna?

Sir Trev 12-10-10 12:21 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by muffles (Post 2391529)
I realise I may not have been clear btw - I am talking about *both* bikes being at 8k.

Quite a lot of us don't particularly like being at those sorts of revs. It's one of the reasons I chose a v-twin. The howl of a short stroke middle weight IL4 just doesn't do it for me.

muffles 12-10-10 12:36 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Trev (Post 2391589)
Quite a lot of us don't particularly like being at those sorts of revs. It's one of the reasons I chose a v-twin. The howl of a short stroke middle weight IL4 just doesn't do it for me.

That's fair enough, I'm not arguing with what you like/don't like. Equally there are probably quite a lot (not necessarily on this site, after all it is a v-twin owner's site...) that don't particularly like being at low sorts of revs. And the grumbly sound of a v-twin doesn't do it for them.

All I'm saying really, I suppose, is that it seems a bit silly for people to say "I luvs the instant torque of a twin, I do" as though it's just "right" and it can't be turned around the other way to benefit an IL4. It's a personal choice not a simple, global, "truth"...

Berlin 12-10-10 12:38 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by robchester (Post 2391312)
What is it with them? You either love them or you don't. Granted I've only been on 5 il4s but everyone just felt bland. On the other hand every twin or triple I've been on has at least had character even if i didnt particularly like the bike

Hi Rob.

I think this is a conversion issue. If you're used to twins you'll tend to ride the IL4 like a twin whee you get on it and thats not going to get you anywhere.

Riding an Inline 4 is about the top 30% of the rev range unline a twin where its the middle 30%. You have to rev them and once you've got used to that then its a different world.

Despite half a season on the minitwin I'm still riding it like an IL4 looking for another 5K revs once I'm at the red line. Takes a while to change the mind set.

C

fizzwheel 12-10-10 12:44 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Trev (Post 2391589)
Quite a lot of us don't particularly like being at those sorts of revs.

And quite alot of people on here write off IL4's without even having ridden one. They'll base their opinion on what they've read on the internet or what their mate told them. Rather than finding out for themselves.

I appreciate that you might not like it, but why not ? Engine was made to rev, you arent going to break it by doing so.

I've talked to many people who wont even try an IL4, because they think that they might not like it, thats hell of a lot of bikes to discount from riding purely based on its engine configuration.

Quote:

Originally Posted by muffles (Post 2391599)
It's a personal choice not a simple, global, "truth"...

Amen to that

rob13 12-10-10 12:47 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Well, that was quite a response!

I think the issue isnt the noise, as I do actually like the sound of IL4's, but its the seat of the pants test which it seems to fail on. Having been used to various twins and rode singles and triples, I actually like the buzz/vibes etc which I feel through the bike. The IL4s are very smooth which I think is what puts me off. I like to feel the bike buzzing away beneath me.

Reeder 12-10-10 12:49 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
You sound like a girl ;)

-Ralph- 12-10-10 01:16 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Character can mean a lot more than noise and acceleration. Vibration, power delivery, handling, anything you feel or hear when you're riding it.

Big singles thump, v-twins burp, triples howl, flat twin BMW's do that twisting thing.

What kind of IL4 are you talking about Robchester? There's a big difference between a 600 Diversion and a litre sportsbike, and another big difference again between that and a Bandit 1250.

I'd never buy an IL4 600 personally, but I'm currently shopping for a 150bhp Fazer 1000, which is a completely different kettle of fish. Though the fact that 4000-8000 revs on the Fazer is very comparable to the SV between 6000-10000 revs, is a big compliment for the way in which the little 71bhp SV delivers it's power. Take the Fazer above 8000 and there's no other way to describe it other than "it just goes mental".

hardhat_harry 12-10-10 01:23 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
After RF600, Hornet, R6, ZXR400, CBR600 and test riding loads of IL4's I finally saw the light, Triples and twins for me. Took the FZ1 out last month from Yamaha for a full days riding I have never been so bored with 150bhp in my life. By the time the engine had wound itself up to the power band it was time to decelerate into the corner and out of the band again.

-Ralph- 12-10-10 01:28 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hardhat_harry (Post 2391658)
Took the FZ1 out last month from Yamaha for a full days riding I have never been so bored with 150bhp in my life. By the time the engine had wound itself up to the power band it was time to decelerate into the corner and out of the band again.

Hmmm, you need try try riding in a lower gear mate. You can ride round a corner at 10000 revs if you want to.

Milky Bar Kid 12-10-10 01:33 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hardhat_harry (Post 2391658)
After RF600, Hornet, R6, ZXR400, CBR600 and test riding loads of IL4's I finally saw the light, Triples and twins for me. Took the FZ1 out last month from Yamaha for a full days riding I have never been so bored with 150bhp in my life. By the time the engine had wound itself up to the power band it was time to decelerate into the corner and out of the band again.

Nonsense! Clearly weren't in the correct gear either that or you were on an EXTREMELY twisty road.

They are different riding styles and I like them both. The one thing I miss from the SV is the engine braking.

simesb 12-10-10 01:37 PM

Re: Inline 4s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid (Post 2391669)
The one thing I miss from the SV is the engine braking.

I've never really noticed much difference. Brakes make you stop and engines make you go :D

I don't remember missing much engine braking when I was doing the test rides, or remember finding much more when I got back on the SV.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.