12-12-07, 11:03 PM
|
#36
|
Guest
|
Re: To de-restrict or to not de-restrict that is the question
Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzwheel
Apart from me editing the first post to give an explanation of where the thread has come from and by way of explanation as to why I locked the other thread I dont see anybody as making direct refences to him. the idea of spliting those posts out of the other thread was that so a discussion / debate could be had on the subject without him feeling like its all directed at him. If I didnt make that clear at the top of thread then thats my bad. But I notice that so far a discussion is being had on the subject matter without naming names until your post above...
|
Yes Fizz, you did make that clear mate so no worries there, but because the posts originally came from a thread about Plowsie, on a subject matter from that thread regarding his actions, there are a few intimated references.
When people have done something wrong they tend to feel worse when others carry on talking about it. You can’t stop that on a forum, it’s a discussion medium, it would be daft to say we can’t carry on talking about something.
I just read it from the perspective of "how would Plowsie feel reading this?", and putting myself in his position I would feel that the following were references to me. Rightly or wrongly, true/accurate or not, paranoid or not, human nature is human nature I would feel bad reading it as I'd think it was all just a continuation of the previous thread and therefore all about me.
Quote:
from the there orginal plowsie thread
|
Quote:
Someone decides to not conform to their insurance policy
|
Quote:
Ho-hum, your life, your choice, just don't expect anyone to respect you.
|
Quote:
You're both assuming he'd get caught.
|
Quote:
If you want to ride unrestricted, it's nothing to do with the org, so don't brag about it.
|
Nobody has to agree with me or even think that I'm talking sense (Plowise might say I’m being daft), but I was just asking people to be sensitive (theres another thread about that too!) about how Plowsie would feel reading it and be careful to avoid any personal reference.
|
|
|