Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom_the_great
This is exactly the point of the argument because thats not due to illness or poor health that is due to some kind of accident.
again its simply for peoples opinions not to be abused for what people say or believe.
Thanks for the honest responses so far.
|
But surley if due to an accident your body is unable to susstain your life this in your mind would also mean you shouldn't have a transfusion?
it is a load of rubbish! we have the advancement in medical science, and they should be used to the full to alow people to carry on living. No matter the reason, if people were to have an accident like coming off the bike, if they can be keped alive by any means they should.
if people are ill the same. I myself was diagnosed with cancer when i was 18, and although i was very lucky and didn't need any transfusions simply chemo and radio therapy keped me going, a transfusion was next on the list. and i can ensure you if, as, and when (i really hope you dont) you are ever faced with a similar condition, you will take everything to ensure that you are able to get better, and get over the problem that you face.
In my example to say that people shouldn;t have blood transfusions to get over cancer when no life choice of mine, or my families caused it i should be allowed to die, but someone who takes the active desision to ride a motorbike and was to have a accident that put his or her life at risk should have a transfusion...... what a load of crock. Everyone should be given the same possibilities to maintain there life no matter what the reason!