Here's a discussion topic for a rainy Friday.
Actress Keira Knightley recently posed topless for Interview Magazine on the condition that they did not Photoshop her very small breasts in post production. Previously she has had editors and designers 'boost' her not very big bust and it annoys her that they seem to think this is necessary.
Here is the topless pic, I have covered the nipples to abide by the U rating, although I realise what I have covered them with may cause greater offence!
The most obvious example of her gripe is for the film poster for King Arthur
So mighty Org, do you think if a woman is beautiful but has bee sting boobies that's good enough and they should just be appreciated for what they are, or can everything be improved by the magic of manipulation in Photoshop?
Discuss...