SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000
Need Help: Try Searching before posting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-06-05, 12:06 PM   #1
BoltonSte
Member
Mega Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Back in Bolton
Posts: 1,010
Default Spokets.....bit long winded

OK, here's a question for the pool of knowledge that is sv650.0org, I think I know the answer but I want a check as my physics is rusty.

1.) A std sv has front and rear sprockets with a certain number of teeth, just for argument 16/32, giving you the ratio 1:2, because the wheel is a fixed size, 17" and the front sproket does not change then I can adjust this ratio simply by changing the number of teeth on the rear as this is also related to sprocket diameter.

2.) I've seen people talking about putting gixxer rears on, sooooo, I put an R1 rear on, the wheel is still 17", but the sprockets are 18/42. If I now want to keep the same grunt from the orig. SV, I can no longer put a 32 tooth R1 sproket onto the wheel but rather I need to find an R1 sproket that has the correct number of teeth to give it the same diameter as the orig. off the bike?

Or are all sprokets of a given tooth size the same dimeter as the teeth are fixed size?

am I thinking along the correct lines?

Just re-read this looks like an exam....lol

All numbers are made up just for my ease as I don't like decimals.

ste
__________________
Had an SV or three.
Street triple R - gone but not forgotten.
Now trying the lunacy that is KTM with a Superduke GT. for the pillion capability of course.
BoltonSte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-05, 12:19 PM   #2
Cloggsy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The SV650N has a 15 tooth front & a 45 tooth rear... The SV650S has a 15 tooth front & a 44 tooth rear - Yes you can change the ratio by just changing the rear sprocket, in fact, just changing the rear is probably better than reducing the size of the front sprocket as this increases wear on the chain quite substantially...

The sprocket sizes increases in diameter with the increasing number of teeth added, this is why you need a chain with more links in it to compensate for the extra size of the sprockets... (e.g. I want to put a 47 tooth sprocket on the rear of my bike, to do this I need a 110 link chain, as opposed to the 108 link standard chain I have fitted at the moment...)

TBH I dunno whether this answers your point or not, this is just my 2 peneth
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-05, 12:50 PM   #3
embee
Member
Mega Poster
 
embee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 2,804
Default

Ermm

I think you've got it.

There are 2 basic issues.

1 - the "tooth size" you refer to is in essence the designation of the chain type, for example 520, 525, 530 etc. This is the distance between the chain link pins and the width of the chain rollers (or in effect the thickness of the sprocket). The other things like roller diameter are industry standards associated with that chain designation.

2 - You can have however many teeth you want in theory, limited only by a minimum practical size for decent chain life, and what is commercially available. For a 520/525 chain 14T is really the absolute minimum for a decent life, 15T is better.

An additional practical issue is what length chain you need for your chosen sprockets on your chosen bike, clearances etc.

I think what you're aiming at is the question of overall gearing. As far as the sprockets are concerned, just divide one by the other and you get the ratio (e.g. 45/15 = 3.0:1 , 44/15 = 2.9333:1 , 47/16 = 2.9375:1 in other words you'll hardly tell the difference between 44/15 and 47/16)
embee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-05, 02:02 PM   #4
Dan_SV
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloggsy
(e.g. I want to put a 47 tooth sprocket on the rear of my bike, to do this I need a 110 link chain, as opposed to the 108 link standard chain I have fitted at the moment...)
Just as a side issue, you will need a slightly longer chain than that Cloggs. Wouldn't wanna see you getting one which is on the small side. Bear in mind that as well as the extra space on the actual sprocket, the whole chain run will be longer, because the diameter of the rear sprocket is bigger, and most rearward point from the front sprocket is further with a bigger sprocket. I think the length I used in the end was about a 114, but don't quote me on that. Best to be sure, do what I did, get a long one sent (118 link), and cut it down to length.

Dan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 02:22 AM   #5
BoltonSte
Member
Mega Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Back in Bolton
Posts: 1,010
Default

Cheers fella's, I had forgot bout the chain size ie. 520 etc....

sorted

ste
__________________
Had an SV or three.
Street triple R - gone but not forgotten.
Now trying the lunacy that is KTM with a Superduke GT. for the pillion capability of course.
BoltonSte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 09:04 AM   #6
Warren
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

whats a spocket ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 09:07 AM   #7
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bikageboy
whats a spocket ?


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-05, 09:10 AM   #8
Warren
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Novice SV650S Owner (first impressions, bit long winded) AndyW Bikes - Talk & Issues 13 09-08-07 08:18 PM
My Sunday (long, very very long) svsk2 Bikes - Talk & Issues 29 05-08-06 02:08 PM
Speeding BLUFF? Or am I to start worrying? (bit long winded) sd1cko Bikes - Talk & Issues 39 18-05-05 07:48 PM
SV dilemma!...Sorry very long winded! Peter Henry Bikes - Talk & Issues 13 22-04-05 06:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.