Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Not in Yorkshire. (Thank God)
Posts: 4,116
|
![]()
The highways agency are proposing to add an extra lane to sections of the M62 and M1 to ease congestion. This will be achieved by reducing the existing lanes/hardshoulder by 15cm. I am alarmed that these new narrow lanes will remove the ability to filter on these sections of motorway when the inevitable congestion re occurs.
If additional congestion busting lanes are required. Surely the job should be done properly and the adjacent land compulsory purchased etc to enable the expansion of the roads infrastructure new bridges etc.
__________________
Not Grumpy, opinionated. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Already under way fella. Its a nightmare...
See......... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Tree-huggers get no say this way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Can't see theres a couple of skips in the way!
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Plymouth, Devon - mostly.
Posts: 527
|
![]()
the reg on the red one is nearly rude...nearly....
__________________
Twitter: @poseidon_ashore |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 3,151
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Barnet Herts
Posts: 5,071
|
![]()
Nearly rude,but probably accurate.
As for the lane thing,don't motorways have to conform to certain standards in order to be called motorways?I would have thought that included things like having a hard shoulder and a minimum lane width,so maybe the lanes are currently exceptionaly wide.Won't make any difference to conjestion of course as everyone will still drive in the outside lane however many other lanes are available. ![]()
__________________
On a clear day we stand there and look further than the ordinary eye can see. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I don't think that adding extra lanes to motorways works anyway. The cage drivers will still stay nose-to-tail in the rightmost two lanes whilst the left hand lanes are almost empty.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Dandare, ha ha ha git
![]() ![]() Wyrdness - Inside lane it is then. America have got it right, over and undertake, drivers only need to change lanes into the spaces then. Once i'd driven over there, i adopt the same rule for over here (any haters or whingers, im saying shaaaaat itttt now before you whinge). The way I go to work might as well be in the USA anyway. No-one on the inside lane bar the odd 1 or 2, a few people in the middle lane, outside lane is nose to tail all the way down (A2)....... Your not allowed to undertake Your not allowed to flash your not allowed to use your horn. So whil im sitting at 50mph in the outside lane following some weiner who can't drive for toffee, i undertake, i get done for it. Dont you love UK driving ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Rather than mess about adding lanes to motorways so there's more lanes for people to not be able to use properly, why not teach them to use the 3 lanes properly? Advanced compulsory training perhaps?
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Highways Agency Website... | 454697819 | Idle Banter | 1 | 09-02-09 08:45 AM |
Anyone else get a free DVD from the highways agency? | Tim in Belgium | Pennine Massive | 8 | 05-06-08 02:34 PM |
Ham Barn Roundabout A3 complaint to the highways agency | Grinch | South & West Surfers | 8 | 30-11-06 10:41 AM |
New road signs released by Highways Agency! | Stu | Idle Banter | 10 | 21-08-06 02:54 PM |
Highways Agency Vehicles -Patrol | The Mass | Idle Banter | 5 | 12-05-06 12:04 PM |