![]() |
#51 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
After now owning this for a couple of months I thought I would give some feedback...
Its returning around 45-50mpg on a run and the same when I am commusting on it. Infact on monday I went for a quick ride out, around the coast, up and down the gears and generally having a larf. 156miles until the reserve started flashing and 14.3 litres to fill it back up (19litre tank) So thats a good 10mpg more than the SV would have returned on a similar run... Its easier to ride than the SV as well IMO, much smoother and more chuckable as well. ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by flak monkey; 04-05-11 at 02:17 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Devon
Posts: 876
|
![]()
If you were only getting 35-45mpg from your SV there must have been something wrong with it. I was getting 55-65mpg from mine on my 60 mile daily commute, the lower number obtained when cruising at 90+ on the dual carriageway sections (about half of the journey). Sticking to 75-80mph really improved the economy.
FWIW I'm getting about the same as you from my RSV Mille on a commute, but somewhat less on a proper thrash. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norf Hampshire
Posts: 152
|
![]()
I have an old one 1998 and it always brings a smile when exiting corners, now its running good its better, you can have the forks improved on if they not been done youll know as they bounce all over try maxton or Roger at Revolution Racing, economy is fair to good as no need to thrash like the sv650 to attain the same speed. Under-rated bike.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I would average 40mpg on my commute run and 35 on a fun ride on the SV. My commute is fast open A-road and dual carriage way. I would find myself working the SV pretty hard, but not thrashing it. The Storm is much more effortless at the same pace, which must be the sweet spot for the storm!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
You must be riding that thing slower than a restricted ped to get that sort of fuel consumption. Mine didn't do that sort of mpg when I was running it in... very carefully. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Norwich
Posts: 1,955
|
![]()
In contrast I am only getting 30-35mpg with my FI SMT and that is being easy going half the time and the other half nailing it...not had any long runs on it yet though, just ~10 mile commutes and twisty b-road adventures
![]() I'd say you're taking it real easy....
__________________
Mark Triumph and Suzuki owner |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southport
Posts: 1,508
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
______________________________ |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
As I think I've said earlier, I managed to run mine dry at 63 miles once on a mad thrash through the lanes. I thought the bike had a fault and needed recovery to the dealer, but it was bone dry of fuel.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Funny enough I raised the same thing on the VTR forum and strangely I am not the only one who averages 45-50mpg from their storm. Infact it seems the majority do with normal riding. The only conclusion I can come to is that people who get less dont know what the little lever is just by their left foot. No need to rev the nuts of a bigger twin to have a laugh. I ride an an average sort of pace on the road, but certainly dont hang about. I want to keep my license |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|