Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Will socialism work? ? Well Labour's effort hasn't! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Noisy Git
Mega Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax/Leeds
Posts: 26,645
|
![]()
Case in point, "our" government.
__________________
Currently Ex Biker
Now rebuilding a 63' fishing trawler as a dive boat |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]()
Well, a capitalist-democratic model isn't incompatible with socialism... Only when allowed to run to extremes does the greed of the few become more important than the needs of many. Which is exactly what we have now.
The fact is, we're already in a potentially post-poverty world, we could supply the basic needs of the world right now- food, water, basic medicine. Yet we don't. Everyone's seen the stats like the fact that the richest 2% of people in the world control half of the world's wealth, while the 50% of the people who are in the poorer half of the world's population control 1% of the wealth. Personally, I can't see how anyone can possibly defend that, it's not even easy to comprehend let alone justify. And of course, a lot of the labour of the poorest 50% goes straight to the richest 2%. Unrestricted capitalism is obviously a problem, it's a machine designed to condense the wealth of the world into the hands of the smallest possible minority. Unrestricted socialism I think is just as bad, since human beings just basically aren't very nice to each other a lot of the time, you can't build a system and not take into account human nature, it just won't work. So just like anything else, the best approach is probably somewhere in the middle. Course, that's a long way from saying we should all be equal. I don't think we should personally... I don't think it's at all workable, so whether it's desirable or not doesn't matter in the slightest, but I don't think it's desirable either. But we could sustain a massive rebalancing of wealth without shorting ourselves. The best model is the famous "From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs"- the reason I say this is that it imposes a condition on support (to be part of the equation you have to give according to your ability), and it doesn't enforce equal division (because there is always a surplus after the satisfaction of the basic needs). It's a simple model that works. What's left over can be distributed in different ways once needs are met. CEOs are essentially in the same position, they're short-term stewards whose interests don't neccesarily mirror those of the company. We've seen all too clearly lately that the idea of big business and the financial markets as self-managing and self-protecting is just a fairytale, no more real than the idea of governments as the custodians of public interest. And every company is judged by its last year or its last quarter. Companies commit acts of financial insanity daily. And when enough of them do it, it can plunge you into a world recession. Sound familiar?
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" Last edited by northwind; 11-12-08 at 10:24 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
No, I don't lend tools.
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Skunk Works, Nth London
Posts: 8,680
|
![]()
Labour?
Socialism? Some mistake surely.
__________________
If an SV650 has a flat tyre in the forest and no-one is there to blow it up, how long will it be 'til someone posts that the reg/rec is duff and the world will end unless a CBR unit is fitted? A little bit of knowledge = a dangerous thing. "a deathless anthem of nuclear-strength romantic angst" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]()
Not socialism.
<Damn, I got outrun by a squid again>
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Ooh, Utopian socialism sounds even better! It'll be just like Star Trek! ![]() I know human nature means equality will never happen, but it'll be great if it did, and I have a very small glimmer of hope inside, wishing it could. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Noisy Git
Mega Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax/Leeds
Posts: 26,645
|
![]()
They seem to have taken russia in the 80's as a model though, a pointless and unwinnable war in afghanistan, going toward total control of the states subjects (we're not citizens, we're not armed.), massive bureaucracy, next ID cards, then it will be needing to show your papers to travel between counties.
Why would anybody WANT to be equal? What the hell would be the point in living? Guaranteed a long, pointless life, working for the same wage as every other bugger. The chance of a good job, being BETTER than the council estate scum, and the dead-enders is the only reason I get out of bed in a morning. People aren't equal, get over it.
__________________
Currently Ex Biker
Now rebuilding a 63' fishing trawler as a dive boat |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|