Bikes - Talk & Issues Newsworthy and topical general biking and bike related issues. No crapola! Need Help: Try Searching before posting |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Test rode one of the last 950 engined SMs last year, was bloody brilliant. Found an (ahem) private stretch of road that looked similar to the A20 and did a "top speed" attempt, a van pulled into the outside lane about a quarter of a mile ahead and I gently squeezed the brake... and stoppied from over 100mph... Great chassis, terrific engine, phenomenal brakes. Build quality looks good too.
Down sides: vibey bars (after a couple of hours) seat that feels like a wooden plank, those brakes may catch you out in the wet (but I'm sure you'd get used to them). They have now released the 990smT though, which has a comfier seat and a rack: is this now the most fun practical bike on the market? |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny Glasgow
Posts: 1,715
|
![]()
Fragile , highly strung engines with short and expensive services intervals are the things at the back of my mind with any of the Vtwin KTBooms.
![]() Fanatastic parts and finish quality. Mines a 990SM and a get out of jail free card ,ta. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I thought that was just the hardcore off roaders? AFAIK the service intervals on the twins are about 4.5k, so comparable with Jap bikes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Why don't my A roads look like that
![]() Test rode the 690 duke in the summer and was addicted to it, amazing unbelievable bike... didn't get a chance to try the 990 super though...want to try that and the sm next year for sure...saving up already ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]()
The Duke 3 and all of the various 950s and 990s are all on my "Don't testride it because you'll buy it" list
![]()
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,418
|
![]()
.........
Last edited by Mej; 02-07-15 at 05:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,418
|
![]()
.........
Last edited by Mej; 02-07-15 at 05:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Have you ever owned a KTM? Ive not had any real issues with fragile, highly strung engines on the 4 that I've owned. Parts are well speced, brembo, wavy discs,braided lines, magura clutch as standard but I dont think the build/finish quality is any higher than most other bikes out there. Quote:
Change the oil every couple of rides (depending on mileage/ hours running of course). The road range service intervals have been lengthened to make them more comparable/competetive with the jap stuff. Quote:
I love KTM bikes and always have tried to keep at least one available to me to ride (currently 520 enduro). I find that they seem to have developed a machine that anyone who see it will instantly recognise it as its something a little different from the "jap jelly mould". I always have a grin when I've been on a KTM too, they just feel "special". Last edited by speedplay; 12-11-09 at 02:41 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Captain Awesome
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hamble
Posts: 4,266
|
![]() Quote:
The 9*0 engines are about as bulletproof as they come, so long as you're aware of a couple of minor, easily sorted, issues... KTM build bikes that are fun to use, the GSXR is massively competent, technically amazing, but IME sterile and every time you open the garage door you'll wish you'd at least tried the KTM... ![]()
__________________
Official "Dumbass of the Year" 2011 (•_•) ( •_•)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■) Deal with it... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Most of the issues were with the early bikes thought wernt they? 1980-1995 were renowned for "issues"
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|