SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).
There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too.

View Poll Results: do you think the 1969 lunar landing was a fake
fake 14 38.89%
real 22 61.11%
not sure 0 0%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-02-05, 07:36 PM   #21
northwind
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
northwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,082
Default

Hmm, can't play the flag waving video, it's in .ram and WMP doesn't play it any more. But every other video of the flag "waving" I've ever seen was taken either as or just after it was moved, so it was still wobbling about. In near-vacuum, something like a flag on a springy pole would wave around for longer than it would here.

I like when NASA occasionally turn aroundand say "Those pictures look touched up, because we touched them up. They didn't look too good." The conspiracy theorists hate that.

I see they're still talking crap about Van Allen belts as well... They did their research on that by reading Fantastic Four comics.
__________________
"We are the angry mob,
we read the papers every day
We like what we like, we hate what we hate
But we're oh so easily swayed"
northwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 08:09 PM   #22
ReLoAd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When all this came out i'm sure i heard something about japan or china was going to send a probe or a man up to look at the moon and find out if ther had been there, if they have been there there should still be boots prints flags..oh and a sodding great 4x4 moon rover thing..


If not just point hubel at it it must be able to see something.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 08:11 PM   #23
northwind
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
northwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,082
Default

Think Hubble's a bit longsighted for that... But maybe a high-level earthbound telescope could do the same? Of course, if it was a US one then that'd obviously already be a member of the dark cabal...
__________________
"We are the angry mob,
we read the papers every day
We like what we like, we hate what we hate
But we're oh so easily swayed"
northwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 08:54 PM   #24
madmartyn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheelnut
Im convinced it was filmed in the Arizona desert, or in /death Valley :P

I think there had been so much money wasted on space exploration, that the lying yanks had to produce some evidence.

I reckon the Russians were the first ones up there when their lada engined space rocket broke down
area 51, and they so stupid they probably still got the film set and props there somewhere
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-05, 11:12 PM   #25
Ed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReLoAd
When all this came out i'm sure i heard something about japan or china was going to send a probe or a man up to look at the moon and find out if ther had been there, if they have been there there should still be boots prints flags..oh and a sodding great 4x4 moon rover thing..


If not just point hubel at it it must be able to see something.
All wrong. All they'd find is mice. Everyone knows the moon's made of cheese.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13-02-05, 12:52 AM   #26
ReLoAd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sythree
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReLoAd
When all this came out i'm sure i heard something about japan or china was going to send a probe or a man up to look at the moon and find out if ther had been there, if they have been there there should still be boots prints flags..oh and a sodding great 4x4 moon rover thing..


If not just point hubel at it it must be able to see something.
All wrong. All they'd find is mice. Everyone knows the moon's made of cheese.
bugger i didnt think of that, i forgot when i went on holiday there last year the hotal was running wild with them. All i remember was tom hanks landing on my roof

And one more thing if neil armstrong was the first person to set foot on the moon, then who was it that took the photo of him coming down the steps putting the "first" foot on the moon?

Ahhhhhh there little space suits arreeee soooo cccuuutttiieeee woooouuttiiieee

Ahem!
  Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-05, 12:27 AM   #27
Jp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I hate all this multiple light source stuff.

Wouldnt the earth reflecting the suns light be a light source, just as the moon reflecting the suns light provides a light source for us
  Reply With Quote
Old 14-02-05, 12:53 AM   #28
northwind
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
northwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,082
Default

They always say "Supposed to be from a single light source" but NASA never actually claims that... The lander, rover and individual suits all carried lights after all.
__________________
"We are the angry mob,
we read the papers every day
We like what we like, we hate what we hate
But we're oh so easily swayed"
northwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
honey moon in oz? hovis Idle Banter 16 24-04-08 02:03 PM
Hard landing DanDare Idle Banter 10 28-01-07 05:30 PM
Moon landing (again) - conspiracy theorists will love this.. keithd Idle Banter 51 19-08-06 12:32 PM
Jumbo Jet beach landing! kciN Idle Banter 17 17-07-06 10:14 PM
We will be landing at... :) jonboy Idle Banter 19 29-03-06 10:27 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.