Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick). There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too. |
View Poll Results: do you think the 1969 lunar landing was a fake | |||
fake | 14 | 38.89% | |
real | 22 | 61.11% | |
not sure | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
12-02-05, 07:36 PM | #21 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,082
|
Hmm, can't play the flag waving video, it's in .ram and WMP doesn't play it any more. But every other video of the flag "waving" I've ever seen was taken either as or just after it was moved, so it was still wobbling about. In near-vacuum, something like a flag on a springy pole would wave around for longer than it would here.
I like when NASA occasionally turn aroundand say "Those pictures look touched up, because we touched them up. They didn't look too good." The conspiracy theorists hate that. I see they're still talking crap about Van Allen belts as well... They did their research on that by reading Fantastic Four comics.
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
12-02-05, 08:09 PM | #22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When all this came out i'm sure i heard something about japan or china was going to send a probe or a man up to look at the moon and find out if ther had been there, if they have been there there should still be boots prints flags..oh and a sodding great 4x4 moon rover thing..
If not just point hubel at it it must be able to see something. |
12-02-05, 08:11 PM | #23 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,082
|
Think Hubble's a bit longsighted for that... But maybe a high-level earthbound telescope could do the same? Of course, if it was a US one then that'd obviously already be a member of the dark cabal...
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
12-02-05, 08:54 PM | #24 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
12-02-05, 11:12 PM | #25 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
13-02-05, 12:52 AM | #26 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
And one more thing if neil armstrong was the first person to set foot on the moon, then who was it that took the photo of him coming down the steps putting the "first" foot on the moon? Ahhhhhh there little space suits arreeee soooo cccuuutttiieeee woooouuttiiieee Ahem! |
||
14-02-05, 12:27 AM | #27 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I hate all this multiple light source stuff.
Wouldnt the earth reflecting the suns light be a light source, just as the moon reflecting the suns light provides a light source for us |
14-02-05, 12:53 AM | #28 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,082
|
They always say "Supposed to be from a single light source" but NASA never actually claims that... The lander, rover and individual suits all carried lights after all.
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
honey moon in oz? | hovis | Idle Banter | 16 | 24-04-08 02:03 PM |
Hard landing | DanDare | Idle Banter | 10 | 28-01-07 05:30 PM |
Moon landing (again) - conspiracy theorists will love this.. | keithd | Idle Banter | 51 | 19-08-06 12:32 PM |
Jumbo Jet beach landing! | kciN | Idle Banter | 17 | 17-07-06 10:14 PM |
We will be landing at... :) | jonboy | Idle Banter | 19 | 29-03-06 10:27 PM |