Chelsea/England oh dear!

Originally Posted by Jelster

As much as it pains me to say it, England would be less than the sum of its parts without Beckham. He's a hardworking highly skilled footballer who is probably the best crosser of the ball from the right.

He is also one of those players that can produce you something just when you need it... Remember the game against Greece ? Who else would you rather have taking a free kick in that situation ?

Gerrard is probably doing just as well from the right. And ask Liverpool fans about his ability to produce something from nothing (albeit more from open play). I just feel there are players that offer more both individually and would as a unit than putting Beckham in. IMO you still need an out and out holding midfield player which would mean dropping one of Lampard, Gerrard or Beckham and looking at their goals and assists for their clubs I think it's Beckham that has to go. Mind you, it's all crap really as even if we all agreed on this way, Sven wouldn't have the balls to do it.

[Sid Squid]

Originally Posted by jonboy

How can just two words be so true? .


.

Using the apostrophe and s as a contraction for is then that makes three words.

Call it 2.5 'cos I'm feeling generous.

Pedant!



Bugger .

.

football is crap

the three truest words ever

But that's five .


.

not anymore