Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#31 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
No aircraft would EVER catch a Blackbird, the only hope a Mig-25 would ever have had was if it was directly in the path of the Blackbird, and had warning of it being inbound... could have been interesting then... though the Mig-25 was supposedly a tad faster than the Blackbird in a clean config, I think it was said, if the Mig went over Mach 2.8, then the engines were toast.. basicaly, once the fighter got back they were taken out and thrown, as bits would have melted
![]() which is the same boat the F-15 is in.. claimed top speed by manufacturers is Mach 2.5.. reached by the record attempt Streak Eagle (not strike) which was an F-15 A stripped of anything not needed for it to fly... normal F-15s wont see anyting above 2.3.. with weapons, Mach 1.8 is a struggle for an F-15C and takes an age, and most of its fuel to get there... |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
As Slider would say "You're giving me a h*rd-on"!
![]() Saw an SR-71 at an airshow a few years back - highlight of my aircraft-spotting life - even better than the B2. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I remember seeing the F117A at Mildenhall on one of the first times it was displayed publicly.
It was all roped off and there where four armed guards round it. I remember thinking "It looks like its made of cardboard" at the time ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
The most cool thing about it is that it was flying for 7-8 years before it was admitted that they existed. I wonder how long it will be before they admit Aurora? And I believe that there were fewer SR-71 pilots than astronauts. That's exclusivity. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Didn't they award Astronauts wings to Blackbird pilots, due to them flying on the edge of space? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The Blackbirds still an air breathing Jet, so I dont think it would class as on the edge of space.. now, the X-15 on the other hand.. was a rocket with a man in it... THAT was fast, and that did skirt the edge of space... mach 7 I think that thing would do... ?
Im pretty sure Mig-25's could fly up at the Blackbirds altitude... the main difference was the Blackbird could effectively cruise at that altitude and speed all day, whereas the Mig could only do those speeds and altitudes in a burst... and would shag the engines if it went over mach 2.8 NATO had tracked a Mig-25 doing 3.2+ during the cold war, but didnt know that the Russians had to scrap the engines after that flight on that jet... Blackbirds never actualy flew directly over Russia at all, so we would never have found out either... The USSR also had some nasty SAM systems, which is another reason the Blackbird never overflew Russian airspace.. the US wasnt prepared to take the risk in finding out either after the Garry Powell incident in the U-2 in the 60's They now have a real nasty system in the S300 series SAM's.... you dont want to mess with that, as quoted range makes the U.S. Patriot system look like a pea shooter... |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() Do Patriot systems actually work? I thought they caused considerably more damage in the 1st gulf war than the Scuds they were trying to shoot down, and there was a question as to whether they actually managed to shoot any down. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The Foxbat could only match the Blackbird clean...and for about 2 minutes :P
With missles it was no where near. The Blackbirds true top speed was never told but it was higher than any Foxbat. Plus the Habu had top of the line ECM so even if the Foxbat could catch, its radar would be jammed. X-15 is another kettle of fish...what a machine...makes even the Habu look like a moped. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() As for the original post, its a good story, but I doubt it is true for a whole bunch of reasons!! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for that - wouldnt have read it otherwise. Cool Read now. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot power vs pilot road | James SV | Tyres | 30 | 18-05-09 10:20 PM |
Save the navy... | Stingo | Idle Banter | 1 | 18-12-08 10:41 AM |
US Navy Howler... | Cloggsy | Idle Banter | 6 | 29-09-07 03:36 PM |
Pilot Power or Pilot Road? | mario | Tyres | 3 | 06-10-06 03:45 AM |
Michelin Pilot Sport or Pilot Power ? | mihaip | Tyres | 0 | 22-09-06 12:02 PM |