Gays should be tattooed with warnings

Originally Posted by cuffy

and if anyone is currently reading there way through the bible...don't other...He dies at the end

oi, SPOILER

Originally Posted by cuffy

...don't bother...He dies at the end

Give away the story why don't you..................

Spoil sport

[Jayneflakes]

Originally Posted by cuffy

Have to agree with you on that me ol' china.
It's not natural but it's a more commonly acceptable practice nowdays

If you think that homosexuality is not natural, what do you make of these guys and these guys?

Human sexuality is as varied as humans them selves.

Also I think that New Scientist, a couple of issues ago, ran an article on sexuality and the biological origins. Hard to argue against nature over nurture when it is linked to biological causes. The difficulty is though, if homosexuality is linked to a gene, can then you argue that it is a faulty gene?..

Sits back and awaits the faeces to fly.

Originally Posted by cuffy

if anyone is currently reading there way through the bible...don't other...He dies at the end

beaten to it by captainsmelly and grh

Originally Posted by Jayneflakes

If you think that homosexuality is not natural, what do you make of these guys and these guys?

Human sexuality is as varied as humans them selves.

Also I think that New Scientist, a couple of issues ago, ran an article on sexuality and the biological origins. Hard to argue against nature over nurture when it is linked to biological causes. The difficulty is though, if homosexuality is linked to a gene, can then you argue that it is a faulty gene?..

Sits back and awaits the faeces to fly.

if it is linked to a gene then thats another reason why gene therapy is scary (well, for people with that gene).

[northwind]

I think if you're going to try and deter gay men from enjoying bottom-lovin', that this warning message might be coming a wee bit too late

Originally Posted by neio79

However i do think it is not natural at all. The human race is designed to breed via intercourse male to female not m to m or F to F. If that had been the case then we would all have evolved as hemaprhodites.

Lots of monkeys do it, it's not a human only trait, it's a broad primate trait, so that definately supports the argument that it's completely natural... Sex of course isn't just about reproduction.

The only way you can really support the argument that it's not natural would be to denounce ALL non reproductory sex as not natural- which I'm thinking you probably don't want to do Condoms aren't natural...

Originally Posted by northwind

I think if you're going to try and deter gay men from enjoying bottom-lovin', that this warning message might be coming a wee bit too late



Lots of monkeys do it, it's not a human only trait, it's a broad primate trait, so that definately supports the argument that it's completely natural... Sex of course isn't just about reproduction.

The only way you can really support the argument that it's not natural would be to denounce ALL non reproductory sex as not natural- which I'm thinking you probably don't want to do Condoms aren't natural...

And 'taking matters into your own hands' is therefore a no-go, as well as being un-biblical. Which is a shame as our friend here seems to be quite good at it.

I think you all should get stoned, take that as you read it as it could have a number of meanings.

Originally Posted by Jayneflakes

If you think that homosexuality is not natural, what do you make of these guys and these guys?

, if homosexuality is linked to a gene, can then you argue that it is a faulty gene?..

They are freaks.

and nope if its faulty lets hope these gene therapy peeps can fix it then.

I notice Hovis posted and ran LOL , light the fuse and give it legs in the opposite direction . Personally , we are all different and should be left to our own devices as long as no one harms another .