Gold digging Ex-wives!!

neio for P.M

Originally Posted by sarah

You really don't get it do you?

no

Originally Posted by neio79

yes any overall gain where both have contributed equally finacially, but not if one came in and gave nothing sat arround and then claimed half at the end.

Originally Posted by hovis

neio for P.M

Originally Posted by Pedrosa

what? what i say??

Originally Posted by neio79

no

Oh dear. I would explain the reasoning behind it if I thought you could understand.

Originally Posted by neio79

yes any overall gain where both have contributed equally finacially, but not if one came in and gave nothing sat arround and then claimed half at the end.

By that i take it you mean paid equal share of the mortgage and the bills etc so 50-50.... not by the woman (or man if woman is on more money) "sitting"
at home looking after the kids??

Originally Posted by Samnooshka

By that i take it you mean paid equal share of the mortgage and the bills etc so 50-50.... not by the woman (or man if woman is on more money) "sitting"
at home looking after the kids??

yes, i mean the sat at home bum could be man or woman. why should they benifit from something they did not work for?

Originally Posted by neio79

what? what i say??

Sorry fella but that is exactly how your coming across. You have not budged from your original knee jerk opinion which continues to ignore agreements made within couples as to the roles each will carry out, plus any sense of anything other than "what is mine...stays mine!"

Originally Posted by sarah

Oh dear. I would explain the reasoning behind it if I thought you could understand.

please enlighten me