05-07-10, 06:16 PM | #41 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Jesus christ.
I'll see what they say. |
05-07-10, 06:20 PM | #42 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Emailed.
|
05-07-10, 06:37 PM | #43 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Cheers hongman
I used to do this: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&so...01.94,,0,15.02 One Almax 4 through the rear wheel and around lampost. One Almax 4 through the rear wheel and over the seat effectively locking the rear wheel to the bike. Both on a single Squire lock. A right faff, but I slept well (I no longer live there, so not worried about posting locations/security details) |
05-07-10, 09:58 PM | #44 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Quote:
Quote:
Lets see what he has to say tomorrow and give him a nice welcome to the org! |
||
05-07-10, 10:25 PM | #45 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 2,218
|
Re: Bike Security
Yup I have had great service from those guys. I have the Anti Pinch Pin and there Uber Ground Anchor. They were out of the ground anchor but emailed me the instant it came back in stock.
__________________
Smokey Black Burnty 02 - Racetech Smoulderlators + .90kg BBQ Springs, zx10r shockingly toasted, Conti Road Attacks heat up very nicely, R&G Crash Bungs but what f**king use are they, No Colour Matched Hugger, Flame Extenda, Beowulf Titainium Oval Flame Thrower. |
05-07-10, 11:06 PM | #46 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Is that Stephen Briggs from Pragmasis ? If it is then he was very helpful with me at the beginning of this year with regards to getting an Anti-Pinch Pin for the SV . I actually owe him a picture as well of it installed for the site , I will get my camera ready tomorrow and send him one
|
06-07-10, 07:17 AM | #47 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
|
06-07-10, 10:29 AM | #48 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
My ZX is ground anchored outside my bungalow under car port with an Almax chain and squire lock, urban chaina nd lock, disc lock alarm (xena), brake and throttle clamp a cover and wedged in by my Galaxy, but remember if they can not see it, they wont nick it, the gardenais a good option but front is ok, you would be surprised what people will sleep through and just how easy/good the thieves are, get an Almax IV expensive but worth it and get it covered.
http://www.almax-security-chains.co....ies-IV/c-1-70/ They say it's the:- *Worlds toughest security chain! *The only 19mm quadruple tempered security chain! *Case hardened (not through hardened) *Carbon manganese alloy steel enhanced with boron. *Thatcham Approved *Impervious to hand bolt cropper attacks! *Hacksaws useless! *Zinc plated with gold passivation for maximum corrosion protection. *Almax's long link system allows:- -You to lock your chain off tight, stopping sledge, wedge and freeze attacks dead in their tracks! -Multiple Almax chains to be secured with just the one lock! -It to utilise Squire's flagship lock the Squire stronghold SS65CS -With a solid hardened steel lock body (no cheap plastic here)! *Hardened boron steel shackle *Anti drill protection on cylinder *Over 260,000 key differs *Independent CEN 6 rating! *Cannot be bolt cropped due to it's solid steel closed shackle protection! Last edited by SUPERSTARDJ01; 06-07-10 at 10:39 AM. |
06-07-10, 12:49 PM | #49 | |||||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Hi,
This is Steve, from Pragmasis. We manufacture the Anti-Pinch Pin, the Torc Ground Anchor, the 'Protector' range of chains, and various other bits. Neither of us have got an SV, but I did have a GSXR, if that's any good? I might be able to clarify a couple of things, perhaps dispell some myths, and maybe help out a bit. I will surely miss a couple of questions, so feel free to ask either through this thread or by contacting us direct. Our product range and contact info is on our web site: http://www.torc-anchors.com Quote:
You get a clue if you bother to look closely at the individual chain links: If the metal has been bent smoothly, without distortion to the profile and without kinks, and if the weld is 'full penetration', cleanly finished and without cracks/fissures, it is probably one of the better chains. The majority of big name manufacturers are producing chains that fail on one or more of these simple visual checks. If the material has been butchered as the links have been shaped, you can be pretty certain that it is not as strong as it should be, as there will be areas of excess stress within the link. We've seen many chains where the welds have been incomplete, even with rust leaching out of the joint - if there is rust, you can be pretty sure there is a crack, and cracks are never strong! This is all commonsense stuff, really. We also believe that the best profile for a security chain is round. As simple as that. If you have a square or hexagonal/etc shaped bar, there are edges/ridges in the profile which make it easier to get the first 'nip' with bolt-croppers. Once you've got that nip, you are halfway through. So, we'd suggest you should always go for a round-section chain with well-formed links and good welds. The material quality and the heat treatment can't be judged easily, but you can get a clue sometimes by dropping a bit of chain on a concrete floor - if it 'rings' too much, it is probably too brittle. That gets easier to judge with experience, and all chains will make some kind of ring/clatter, but it is only a clue. You can't be sure without a metallurgical analysis. We do that on every batch of our chain - we get a lab test so we know the actual surface hardness, case depth, and the core hardness on every batch we produce. This is an important quality check as it reflects the quality of the raw material and also on the heat treatment that it has been through. We also do some other checks on every batch, but the lab test is the most important in our opinion. Chain Sizing: A "16mm" chain is made from 16mm diameter bar. The link dimensions vary from manufacturer to manufacturer but are usually similar to our 132 x 62mm outside dimensions on our 16mm. We produce a range of Protector chains, with the 19mm being sold mostly to the MoD, the 16mm more run-of-the-mill for bike security, the 13mm used a lot for high-end push-bikes and as a carry-chain for motorbikes, and the 11mm for mid-range push-bikes etc. The dimensions are all on our web site: http://www.torc-anchors.com/security...linkdimensions We guarantee that both the 16mm and the 19mm chains are impossible to bolt-crop by hand, even with the Irwin Record 42" bolt-croppers. Those croppers are designed to cut non-hardened steel up to about 13mm diameter, but they can cut a 16mm chain that is of low quality. They are borderline on good quality 13mm chain - we can't bolt-crop our own 13mm chain and neither can Sold Secure, the independent testing agency endorsed by the Police and insurers etc. Indeed, just last week our range had its annual Sold Secure audit and everything passed with flying colours. You can check for yourself by going to their web site and entering "Protector" into the keyword field on the following page, for example: http://www.soldsecure.com/search/ You can see that our 16mm and 19mm chains have Caravan Gold, which is a significantly higher standard than Motorcycle Gold. Feel free to compare with others. Thatcham are another testing agency. We don't rate them for physical security products like locks and chains, but they are the ones to trust when it comes to alarms and immobilisers. In our experience, a lot of products that fail Sold Secure's more rigorous physical test standards, get put through Thatcham testing. That is not always the case (I'm sure Almax's chains would pass Sold Secure tests with no problem), but it has happened in several other cases. Quote:
Grinders are dangerous to use, and if you asked me to grind one of our chains when it's not in a vice, I would refuse, even if it's lying on the floor (which it shouldn't be if you're using it properly). The chances of the disc snatching on a wobbling chain link are too high. These discs spin at 7,000rpm on cordless grinders or at about 14,000rpm on the (much more powerful) mains grinders. The disc can shatter and explode if it snatches. That is really not funny. OK, the thief doesn't have to do all the Health and Safety stuff we have to do, but he still doesn't want to get hurt. Grinders are also very spectacular and noisy, so that probably contributes to the rarity of their use by bike thieves (thankfully). If you've just got a disc lock, whether alarmed or not, and he's got a van at the ready, there's a very good chance your bike will go. Virtually all bikes are stolen by being lifted into a van, so to have any confidence you need to lock your bike _to_ something solid. Most thefts also happen from home, so that is the priority to get the security right: a good ground anchor with a good chain and a good lock, all installed & used properly. That means don't get a ground anchor and fit it on a tarmac drive, or on block paving; don't get a good chain and wrap it just around a wheel - yes, wheels really are easy to remove, and it's silent - always always go through the frame if at all possible. Don't put a chain through something like a footpeg that unbolts, or can be broken off; it has to be structural to be any good. Keep the chain and lock off the floor - hammering is a good way and a quick way of breaking poor quality chains, but if they are up in the air, it is much harder for a thief to hammer them against anything solid. It is also harder to use bolt-croppers on something high up. Quote:
An anchor is only as good as the surface it's mounted on. Concrete, as a rule, is much stronger than brick. Tarmac, blockpaving, and plasterboard are all useless. The Hardie anchor is made in the Far East and is supplied with a single expanding bolt fixing. They make a claim about how strong that bolt is. It is virtually irrelevant in my opinion because it's not the bolt that is the weak point - it's the concrete or the brick! In our opinion, any anchor with less than 3 fixings is very vulnerable to being wedged/hammered and lifted. A single fixing is crucially dependent on the quality of substrate over a very small area; a 2-fixing anchor has a vulnerability to being clouted from one side and from the other side. Only 3+-fixing anchors actually hold the thing down in both directions - how many one-leg or 2-leg stools to do you see? It's the same thing: 3 or more legs makes it stable, just the other way up in the case of an anchor Quote:
We had someone contact us last week who had used a crowbar to pull out his Kryptonite anchor! He wanted to use our chemical resin fixings when he re-installed it. We pondered on the merits of supplying an upgrade to a competitor's anchor, but thought what the heck and helped him out. There are situations where the resin is not suitable, and that's why we also offer a fitting kit that uses expanding bolts. They are nothing like as good, which is why our Torc ground anchor is the highest-rated on the market **when it is used with the chemical resin fixings**, where it has Sold Secure Caravan old, but it just Motorcycle Gold when used with the expanding bolts. The resin approach is good for solid substrates like concrete, but brick walls have voids in the mortar joints etc and there we have to use the expanding bolts. We've still got 4 of them, and they're still well spread out, but they don't get such good performance from the substrate and that is usually the limiting factor. Quote:
I'll say something about discounts in the next reply as this is already a massive post In summary, our philosophy is that you should take some responsibility for protecting your property and not rely on insurance, you should use security that is appropriate and that has no obvious weak links (and part of that is how you use it as well as how good it is), and if you avoid advertising what you've got (use a scruffy old bike cover!), you are much less likely to have a bad day. Don't buy security that is too heavy for _you_ to use every time - there is no point in having Fort Knox security and leaving it lying on the floor! Sometimes a compromise is sensible, or pragmatic, and a heck of a lot better than nothing. Usability is important, and so is quality. I hope that helps. Feel free to ask questions or to contact us direct. Cheers, Steve. |
|||||
06-07-10, 01:43 PM | #50 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Bike Security
Hi again,
Gosh, it took me quite a while to write that last post and I see there have been a few more posts in the meantime - this is a busy place We do try to give great customer service. We just try to do sensible, reliable, good quality stuff and to supply it in a friendly and helpful way. I'm sure the Dragons' Den guys would tell us to stop all sorts of things we do, probably including the Anti-Pinch Pin (too much of a distraction, not enough profit), but we like to help people out and we like to make stuff, here, in the UK! A lot of our stuff has been designed because we had a problem ourselves, so we use a lot of it on a daily basis. Not everything - there's only so many things you need to chain down - but we certainly learn from our experiences and try to make improvements along the way. E.g. one of my projects at the moment is to make a better jig for welding our ground anchors - I actually do the welding myself and am happy to discuss technicalities with anyone that is interested. I like welding I also make the Pin using the lathe we have here. Regarding pricing, we started out about £10 cheaper than our current price because we expected to sell a lot of packages with ground anchor and chain and lock and Pin, where the other items are able to subsidise the manufacture and cost-recovery for the Pin. "Cost-recovery" because, for example, it cost a good fraction of £1,000 to get the Pin Sold Secure tested when we first developed it (I can't remember the exact figure). We need to recover that from the margin we make on each Pin, and at the lower price we were basically making nothing when we sold a Pin on its own. The majority of Pins have been sold like that, and because it's a bit of a pain of a product in having lots of different lengths and most of them being time-consuming to pack for shipping out, annoying issues with Squire not machining their locks consistently, and lots of discussion being involved when people aren't sure if the thing's any good or not, we found ourselves spending a lot of time getting nowhere and not doing much in the way of paying back that Sold Secure test fee and other development etc costs, let alone making much money from the idea. We don't sell that many, and took the decision last year not to renew the test certification with Sold Secure as that was a noticeable chunk of cash as well. In fact, we can't get the grade of steel in the right size at the moment to make any more, so we'll have to spend more time to sort that out and material costs never go down. All in all, we can't give discounts on single Pin-only sales. Sorry. Come to us for 3 Pins and we can certainly do something to help, though! Do your homework first, read the blurb on our web site about using a broomhandle etc to gauge the length(s) of Pin required, and decide if you think it will really help you to secure your bike in your situation: http://www.torc-anchors.com/anti-pinch-pin.php Having said all that, we do have a bit more room on bigger sales and suggest that people e-mail us in advance to confirm what we might be able to do. It is difficult as we already discount our RRPs significantly in the Package Deals we offer, and anything over £100 gets free shipping as well. The Package Deals are often discounted 20-25% from RRPs, and the free shipping basically knocks about £9 straight out of our margin. Our RRPs are also lower than several other suppliers, when you compare like with like. Not all chains are equal and not all anchors are equal, for example. If we offered another 10% across the board, we'd be doing quite a lot of quite high value sales with a lot of product included, for about £30 margin, which isn't really good business for us. It means we are working hard to just stand still. In real terms, that means we're going backwards. Maybe that sounds greedy but we have to be at least a bit business-like if we are also going to supply stuff that is of the quality that it is and if we are going to continue manufacturing in the UK. We have zero intention of moving manufacture elsewhere or of dropping quality, or of dropping our customer service (which takes a lot of time, incidentally). We have also been stung in the past when we've offered discounts and previous customers have come back and asked for a refund. Being nice people (or perhaps I should say 'soft' people!), we gave refunds in those cases, although we didn't bargain for that when we worked out the discounts we could do. We really can't do retrospective discounts any more as it's crazy from a business standpoint. In summary, talk to us, preferably by e-mail as it's a pain when the phone goes and I'm half way through a weld Tell us you're from this forum and what package you're thinking of, and we'll give a straight answer if we can do anything more to help. If you group together a bit so we are shipping out a single box and doing one load of paperwork, that is better for us than lots of individual orders and is more likely to come into the free shipping etc categories anyway. Try to help us and we'll try to help you. Cheers, Steve. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bike Security - Anchor? Chain? Bike Tracker? | cbay | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 27 | 31-12-09 12:58 PM |
Your bike security | the_lone_wolf | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 40 | 18-07-09 06:04 PM |
Bike security | Razor | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 22 | 04-12-06 06:43 PM |
Bike security | lukemillar | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 11 | 07-11-06 05:07 PM |
Bike Security | SoulKiss | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 21 | 11-09-06 06:30 AM |