Nutsinatin Down :(

[Nutsinatin]

Originally Posted by NTECUK

Taking of your glasses you need to drive
They should never be able to drive again.
Was willful neglect because it hert there nose.
Shame you should be entitled to cut it off so it won't happen again.
Next time it could be a load of pedestrians

I do agree but she was a learner driving under supervision and with the cost of my insurance hike with three years no claims (protected no claims for free so at least that's safe!) I think that cost alone will keep her off the roads for several years, especially if she gets the conviction for careless driving and driving without insurance. It should at least remind her there is a reason that she needs to wear her glasses. Hopefully this is the wake up call she needs and a few more years more maturity before she gets behind the wheel again.

[keith_d]

Originally Posted by Nutsinatin

I do agree but she was a learner driving under supervision and with the cost of my insurance hike with three years no claims (protected no claims for free so at least that's safe!) I think that cost alone will keep her off the roads for several years, especially if she gets the conviction for careless driving and driving without insurance. It should at least remind her there is a reason that she needs to wear her glasses. Hopefully this is the wake up call she needs and a few more years more maturity before she gets behind the wheel again.

If she's getting a conviction for driving without insurance, the qualified driver in the passenger seat may be getting a visit to the magistrates for allowing her to drive uninsured.

[NTECUK]

Your not going to impact any amount on mine or anyone else premiums for claiming for your injury

It's less than the bonus the insurance company will pay the top bras.
You are entitled to it.

[Nutsinatin]

Originally Posted by keith_d

If she's getting a conviction for driving without insurance, the qualified driver in the passenger seat may be getting a visit to the magistrates for allowing her to drive uninsured.

He was arrested and reported for supervising without insurance.

[Matt-EUC]

Originally Posted by NTECUK

I think he ment tuther party insurance.

Yes, I did.

[Red Herring]

Originally Posted by Matt-EUC

Yes, I did.

Yeah, sorry, I did rather jump in a bit quick there. I'm getting as bit tetchy around the NHS at the moment given the way it is being ripped apart and abused but that's no excuse for not following my own advice. I'll take a chill out pill!

[Biker Biggles]

I would also claim for your injuries,even minor ones as the compo from those will offset the inadequate offer you will get for the bike and other losses.You will struggle to make back the future insurance hikes for just being involved in a crash,even a no fault one,and the time you spend dealing with the whole incident.The bike will be valued lower than its worth to you.A few hundred quid for your injuries will help to repay you for those other losses.
Where did the crash happen?Im interested in why the ambulance was not sent and which trust was it?Im not convinced by your mates mum and that 19 minute thing either.I think that target went a good few years ago and has been replaced by something different.