hard numbers k5 - SV650.org

15-05-05, 04:51 AM

does anyone have the hard numbers for a k5 sv650s?

15-05-05, 05:08 PM

Is that like calculus?

15-05-05, 05:31 PM

69 ? 42 ?

16-05-05, 03:45 AM

you really think its that much lower than last year?

16-05-05, 07:02 AM

Should be pretty much the same as the K4 for the 650. The thou has a bit more peak power. Other than that, I don't know.

The K4 was slightly more powerful than the K3, just for any K3 owners who are interested

16-05-05, 08:37 AM

Nothing anybody would notice in a blind back-to-back test.

.

16-05-05, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carsick

The K4 was slightly more powerful than the K3, just for any K3 owners who are interested

Really!!??
That wasn't my experience! Leigh Bradbury had a K4 with a K&N filter & full Akrapovic system and after it was remapped, it still made 3bhp less than my K3 with K&N filter, scorpion slip-on can & a remap!

(I assume you were on a wind-up!!)

16-05-05, 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coombest

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carsick

The K4 was slightly more powerful than the K3, just for any K3 owners who are interested

Really!!??
That wasn't my experience! Leigh Bradbury had a K4 with a K&N filter & full Akrapovic system and after it was remapped, it still made 3bhp less than my K3 with K&N filter, scorpion slip-on can & a remap!

(I assume you were on a wind-up!!)

Not a wind up at all.
I'm just talking about quoted figures from Suzuki. All of our bikes vary a bit, so it doesn't surprise me that you had a K3 more powerful than a K4.

16-05-05, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coombest

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carsick

The K4 was slightly more powerful than the K3, just for any K3 owners who are interested

Really!!??
That wasn't my experience! Leigh Bradbury had a K4 with a K&N filter & full Akrapovic system and after it was remapped, it still made 3bhp less than my K3 with K&N filter, scorpion slip-on can & a remap!

(I assume you were on a wind-up!!)

That, or the dyno tester was having a laugh

16-05-05, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamin_Squirrel

Quote:

Originally Posted by coombest

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carsick

The K4 was slightly more powerful than the K3, just for any K3 owners who are interested

Really!!??
That wasn't my experience! Leigh Bradbury had a K4 with a K&N filter & full Akrapovic system and after it was remapped, it still made 3bhp less than my K3 with K&N filter, scorpion slip-on can & a remap!

(I assume you were on a wind-up!!)

That, or the dyno tester was having a laugh

Agreed, I assume they were dynoed at the same place, on the same dyno?

15-05-05, 04:51 AM	#1
griff Guest Posts: n/a	hard numbers k5 does anyone have the hard numbers for a k5 sv650s?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Don't ask me for lottery numbers...............	rictus01	Idle Banter	33	12-07-08 04:07 PM
ICE numbers. Always carry please	petevtwin650	Bikes - Talk & Issues	15	20-03-08 08:00 AM
Richie numbers	amarko5	Pennine Massive	37	04-02-06 07:20 PM
Part Numbers	bikerskez	SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking	10	01-04-05 04:08 PM

15-05-05, 05:08 PM	#2
BURNER Guest Posts: n/a	Is that like calculus?

16-05-05, 03:45 AM	#4
griff Guest Posts: n/a	you really think its that much lower than last year?

16-05-05, 07:02 AM	#5
Carsick Guest Posts: n/a	Should be pretty much the same as the K4 for the 650. The thou has a bit more peak power. Other than that, I don't know. The K4 was slightly more powerful than the K3, just for any K3 owners who are interested

16-05-05, 08:37 AM	#6
jonboy Guest Posts: n/a	Nothing anybody would notice in a blind back-to-back test. .