Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick). There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too. |
|
Thread Tools |
05-04-22, 03:39 PM | #1 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NE Lincs
Posts: 1,065
|
Channel 4 privatisation
The Anus Eater, Nadine, has decided to sell off Channel 4 to allow it to compete against Amazon and Netflix. A free channel competing against pay channels? She obviously has her finger on the pulse (but the pulse of what?) Ch4 doesn't make a profit (not in its remit) all the money it makes is fed back into making more programs.
If you recall, when Bozo refused to take part in an election debate they replaced him with an ice sculpture and the Tories never forgave that sleight. If you're interested in the fight to stop this, there's a petition: https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-pr...-nadinedorries If not, ignore it... (of course I wrote to my MP)
__________________
2016 SV650AL7 2023 GSX-8S |
05-04-22, 05:06 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: nr. Ashby-de-la-Zouch
Posts: 317
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
I'd always regarded Channel 4 as just another station in the competitive advertising-funded market. i can't get particularly excited about this one.
Public-owned and public-funded mean subtly different things to me. If it's never made a profit, what's the downside for the 'public purse' here? (Quality of programming is always heavily subjective.)
__________________
Spannering the wife's SV650S K5 pointy in Black, and son's SV650 X curvy in Blue. RIP SV650 X curvy, crashed and written off December 2019. I'm (procrastinating about) fixing up an old Yamaha FZ600 to get myself fully back on the road. |
05-04-22, 05:58 PM | #3 | |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NE Lincs
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
Quote:
Dorries claimed the government funded it - which, as was pointed out to her, was totally false (and which she should have known). https://www.indy100.com/politics/nad...annel-4-funded She's the Culture secretary and is supposed to promote British culture, this will restrict it. Many of the programs are developed outside of London so it makes more mockery of the whole "levelling up/northern powerhouse" b/s. There is nothing to be gained with this, it's simply vengeance. Channel 4 was the brainchild of Thatcher btw.
__________________
2016 SV650AL7 2023 GSX-8S Last edited by Seeker; 05-04-22 at 05:59 PM. |
|
05-04-22, 07:00 PM | #4 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,200
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
Bring back Brookside !
__________________
>>> ? <<< Past: Street Triple 765rs, DRZ400s,GSXR1000 K9, VFR800 A8, ZX6R 636 2006, CRF250L, GSXR750 K7, VFR800 A7, GSXR750 L3, Street Triple 675R, MT09 Tracer, SV650s K8, CB250rsd, YBR125... |
05-04-22, 07:26 PM | #5 | |||
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: nr. Ashby-de-la-Zouch
Posts: 317
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
Quote:
If it's commercially viable as an overall station (i.e revenue at least covers costs) why couldn't it continue similarly with different owners? Not-for-profit is a perfectly acceptable basis for any organisation, it's not limited to public sector. (I accept a new owner will need to recover their purchase costs by way of some profit scrape.) Quote:
Quote:
If the public purse puts nothing in and gets nothing out why is it so essential to retain? Is it a vanity piece or folly? I think Nadine isn't the only one susceptible to 'red mist' here. Isn't it just good business for the owner to realise some value from their creation? That's how most start-ups hope to go - makes a change to sell on at a profit instead of a loss (ref. RBS!) The death of Channel 4 is not the only unavoidable outcome here. So she did at least one good thing then eh? I'm old enough to remember it launching. I don't know the reasoning behind the decision but I presume this was to promote some true competition for ITV, given her general pro-market, de-regulated ideology. As I said above I don't see why non-commercial national interests can't be channelled via BBC - why do we need continuing Government management time dealing with owning multiple broadcasters?
__________________
Spannering the wife's SV650S K5 pointy in Black, and son's SV650 X curvy in Blue. RIP SV650 X curvy, crashed and written off December 2019. I'm (procrastinating about) fixing up an old Yamaha FZ600 to get myself fully back on the road. |
|||
05-04-22, 09:04 PM | #6 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: NE Lincs
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
OK, just one example: "It's a sin". A drama based on gay young men growing up in London in the 80s as the AIDS epidemic was spreading.
No broadcaster would touch it despite Russel T Davies having a good track record of producing successful programs. It took him 5 years and all the other broadcasters rejecting it until Channel 4 took it on where it became their 3rd most successful series since records began and the most binge watched series on All4. The government don't manage Channel 4 directly - OFCOM set up a board to run it. Likely buyers of Ch4 would be American, either Discovery or Paramount. Since it doesn't cost the tax payer anything and supports home grown talent I see no advantage into turning it into another channel like we already have that are more risk averse. I wouldn't want to see more programs like "I'm a Celebrity" which is where Dorries made her name. (She is also a prolific writer of romance fiction) As a Star Trek fan, Paramount buying it would, perhaps, allow me to see Star Trek: Discovery easier but I'll forego that for keeping the status quo and people in the UK employed. I'm concerned that everything that seems to work in the UK is being sold off, frequently to foreign buyers, and there isn't much of any value left.
__________________
2016 SV650AL7 2023 GSX-8S Last edited by Seeker; 05-04-22 at 09:08 PM. |
06-04-22, 09:15 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: nr. Ashby-de-la-Zouch
Posts: 317
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
Seeker, you may be right. I'm more a devil's advocate in this one.
The downside you describe should be worried about. I don't disagree about that. However, there is also a possible upside that Channel 4 might continue to develop its brand and content (on the basis that some of the stuff Amazon and Netflix have produced probably wouldn't ever have been made by 'conventional' TV either.) I share your concern about the sale of our quality assets. Where I think we may differ a little is that my worry is less about letting good stuff go but more that we seem to be also showing that we've forgotten how to create more good stuff to replace it. For me, it's not the letting go per se but if we don't replenish then our end points will become the same, and I agree that's a bad situation.
__________________
Spannering the wife's SV650S K5 pointy in Black, and son's SV650 X curvy in Blue. RIP SV650 X curvy, crashed and written off December 2019. I'm (procrastinating about) fixing up an old Yamaha FZ600 to get myself fully back on the road. Last edited by Ruffy; 06-04-22 at 09:16 PM. Reason: whitespace removal |
07-04-22, 01:32 PM | #8 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here as devil's advocate
Posts: 11,539
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
every public owned channel is doomed. its the future..... and good riddance.
take the BBC. £159 a year to watch utter fukin crap and more brainwashing news. for about £3 more i can get Amazon Prime and Netflix basic which is a lot more content and service than the BBC can ever hope to achieve. as for Ch4 may it die a death and never come back.. i have not watched that pile of utter shizzt for about 10 years. Ch4 player is the biggest buggy POS that never works that has ever graced the internet. i dont watch terrestrial tv. its all crap and a big pile of it. i will admit to watching BBC iplayer (recently killing eve) maybe 3 times a year but that in no way accounts for the £159 a year i have to pay to do so. terrestrial tv was fine when we were all forced to watch it but things have moved on for the better. |
07-04-22, 02:23 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: N W Leicestershire
Posts: 242
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
I have to disagree! Nothing but nothing comes close to the David Attenborough series of programmes such as the Living Planet, and the others that the BBC have produced.Something GB and the BBC can be proud of
|
07-04-22, 02:52 PM | #10 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here as devil's advocate
Posts: 11,539
|
Re: Channel 4 privatisation
ok if you like that sort of thing... its like sports coverage.. ermm no thanks.
i even stopped watching Dr Who, not due to the new Dr but the plots were rubbish. i like to be entertained not put to sleep with mind numbing repetitive dribble. no offence to Attenborough but once you have seen one of his documentaries you have seen them all. more stuff like Orphan Black and Killing Eve etc.etc and less news and sports and i might just say the BBC was worth the £159 a year... did i say £159 a year.. yes i did.. its extortionate for what you get. in fact i'm going to cancel my licence. |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Bike Channel | Shawthing | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 18 | 27-10-13 08:04 PM |
F1 Channel | littleoldman2 | Idle Banter | 21 | 16-03-12 10:20 AM |
Channel 4 now | DarrenSV650S | Idle Banter | 1 | 14-06-10 10:39 PM |
Channel 4 NOW........ | Girth | Idle Banter | 17 | 05-02-09 09:58 AM |
Privatisation gone too far | sharriso74 | Idle Banter | 3 | 10-05-06 10:15 AM |