SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000 Need Help: Try Searching before posting |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Sorry if this has been covered before but im new and l was wondering what sort of bhp other sv650's are getting on the dyno???? mines a k6 and l had it set up at PDQ near Slough with a full Akrapovic exhaust, k&n and power commander! it was 75.1bhp
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I had mine set up at PDQ too. Top Guys! I have a Full M4 Sysyem, K&N, PCIII USB and its kicking out 78.2bhp (dynojet) system. On a Dynopro mine reads at 71.4bhp which is .6 below minitwins limit!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Mine gets 71.6 bhp at the back wheel. Which is also very slightly below mini-twin limits
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
![]() http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/1...ercurvejn1.png this is the graph, as you can see carbs suck, check out the hole at 8k. This is on a dynojet dyno so it's proberbly massivly over optomistic !! I reckon a real life 66 bhp. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
i got 71.2 on steve jordans dyno, its a K6 with BMC, Micron can and Suzuki re-map, interestingly with the baffle out it only made 1 bhp more from midrange to max but was running a bit too lean, suspect i'd get a better output with a power commander but i didnt want the expense, most important thing here is that all dyno's read different, theres no calibration standard for them....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Ref: "most important thing here is that all dyno's read different"
Exactly. That's the thing. Dynojet's in particular are notoriously optomistic |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
SV800S makes 109.6 bhp and 63ft/Ib
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]()
DD wins
![]() Dynos are pretty useless for comparison- so much down to setup, condition, operator, machine type etc. TBH if you're going to even try and compare then everything but dynojet is meaningless, yes they're not very accurate but they're the yardstick. Oh, and NEVER EVER EVER quote crank bhp ![]() ![]() Mine when last run made, annoyingly, 79 and a half bhp. It should top 80 now, maybe clear 81, the fuelling up top wasn't quite right but I've never run it since. That was a DJ machine so if I'd really wanted a sheet that said 80, we could probably have just run it a few more times ![]()
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" Last edited by northwind; 29-08-08 at 03:05 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: W Mids
Posts: 2,037
|
![]()
y2k ~28k, akrapovic downpipes, scorpion end can, unmodified suzuki air filter/box, no jetting changes, needles 'shimmed', tank foam removed and tank spacered up.
70.6bhp on a dynapro There was no power difference in between it and a minitwin in the real world[1] anyway. Druid [1] Was funny, exited barn behind one and sat the entire length of the straight exactly the same distance behind it, zero difference.
__________________
'00 SV700S - '94 RVF400R - '97 RVF400R - '88 VFR750F |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Anything upwards of 69 bhp is a good power output IMO
I wonder what mine is making? Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MOT Question | DanDare | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 4 | 04-03-08 01:48 PM |
R&G bar end question | lukemillar | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 1 | 21-03-06 10:27 AM |
Bhp Question | kashby | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 4 | 07-05-05 11:39 AM |
N.I.P. Question? | Cronos | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 19 | 21-04-05 11:21 AM |