SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).
There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-05-11, 01:20 PM   #1
strop
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Default 10 months? should've been 10 years

A MOTORCYCLIST was left lying 80 metres from his bike after a head-on smash with a sports car driving on the wrong side of the road.
Gareth Jenkins, 23, suffered multiple injuries after being struck by Michael Parslow’s Toyota MR2 as the sports car overtook three cars.
Parslow, 39, was jailed for 10 months at Oxford Crown Court on Monday after admitting dangerous driving.
Cathy Olliver, prosecuting, said the defendant, of Bernwood Road, Bicester, was driving on the A4095 between Kirtlington and Bicester when the crash happened near the B430 at 5.20pm on November 23.
Miss Olliver said Mr Jenkins saw three cars on the opposite carriageway before Parslow’s red MR2 started overtaking them.
Miss Olliver added: “By the time he realised it was going to hit him, he remembers braking and trying to raise himself high up on the bike. He remembers a crash and woke up on the ground.
“He said he was scared he was going to die.”
The rugby-playing rider broke vertebrae in his neck and back. Other injuries included a ruptured kidney, broken wrists and a fractured shoulder.
Judge Patrick Eccles said Mr Jenkins had “happily made a very substantial recovery” but could not now play contact sport.
Witnesses in the overtaken cars said they were travelling at between 45 and 50mph on the 60mph-limit road when Parslow came past.
Miss Olliver said one of the drivers recalled Parslow coming up fast behind her, adding: “He began to flash his lights and drove very close to the back of her car. At this point she could clearly see the motorcycle coming in the other direction.”
Mr Jenkins’ was found 78 metres from his bike, the wreckage of which was spread over 100m.
Parslow’s pre-sentence report recorded a “history of drug offending” between 1994 and 2003, including nine previous convictions for 14 offences. He was given an absolute discharge for driving while disqualified in 2002.
He was jailed for 10 months and banned from driving for three years. He must also take an extended driving test
strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 01:23 PM   #2
Reeder
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

Wow. 10 months?! What a load of bull****.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 01:25 PM   #3
Milky Bar Kid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

Wow. Considering his previous....wow.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 01:41 PM   #4
Owenski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid View Post
Wow. Considering his previous....wow.
+1
I could *understand* it if the bloke was a solictor himself living a respecatble life, but the guys sounds (or is portrayed) as scum so any oportunity to lock him up would be a good one.

What would be the max sentance this sort of thing could carry?
I dont know if 10months means he got the book or a let off.


Oh and as a very keen sports person, "a substantial recovery, but unable to play contact sport" is not a recovery at all. Im not far off retiering from competative football now, but to have it taken away from me is one of the things I fear the most. Poor guy was only 23, I played my best football around that age - gutted for him.

Last edited by Owenski; 12-05-11 at 01:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 02:05 PM   #5
Biker Biggles
Member
Mega Poster
 
Biker Biggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Barnet Herts
Posts: 5,071
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

Cant really comment on this specific case,but it seems ludicrous that if the biker had died he would have gone down for six years.Why is it that exactly the same bit of **** driving gets a totally different punishment according to a chance outcome?
__________________
On a clear day we stand there and look further than the ordinary eye can see.
Biker Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 03:30 PM   #6
Jimmy2Feet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

Shocking!! ok i understand to a point if he had not past convictions, and the same outcome, but being that he has previous, and the nature of the driving, 10 mths is rediculous!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 03:39 PM   #7
Milky Bar Kid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

Maximum sentence available for S2 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 is 2 years imprisonment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 03:42 PM   #8
Owenski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

in that case he should have gotten 2 years, simple.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 03:43 PM   #9
Luckypants
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
Luckypants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nr Ruthin
Posts: 7,079
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

It does seem quite light, but as he admitted the offence he gets an automatic 50% discount on his sentence IIRC, so he would have got 20 months had he contested the case and been found guilty. Seems to me he pleaded guilty as it was a clear cut case.

Still even 20 months seems light for something that could have killed the poor biker he hit. But these are the cases where sentencing seems out of kilter with the seriousness of the offence. With previous offences resulting in being disqualified and driving while disqualified, he maybe needed a harsher lesson in following the rules of the road.


EDIT: Seen MBK's post that max for the offence is 2 years prison. Given that he pleaded guilty then 12 months is the maximum he could have been given, so 10 months is a 'heavy' punishment for the offence, under current sentencing rules.
__________________
"Your Viffer sounds like it is raising hell! Spot on." - Witchery 17/4/08
Snow Plough Appreciation Society - Member #3


Last edited by Luckypants; 12-05-11 at 03:45 PM.
Luckypants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-11, 04:02 PM   #10
Jimmy2Feet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10 months? should of been 10 years

if he has if killed the biker, i assume he would be up for death by dangerous driving? what is the max sentance for that?
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should've been a footballer... thulfi Idle Banter 5 28-04-11 08:54 AM
Well its only taken 9 months.. 454697819 Idle Banter 10 17-09-09 07:05 AM
Should've done it earlier! ukhammy SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 7 22-07-08 10:54 PM
Obviously should've known better than to go riding on the bank holiday! northwind SV Ecosse 14 13-05-07 07:24 PM
12 months Tax v 6 months Tax GC-SV Idle Banter 11 01-06-06 09:18 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.