![]() |
Re: Driving other vehicles third party
Often with two named drivers the premium is less due to the spread risk??????
My car is cheaper with the wife as second named driver and likewise on her policy with me named A point of interest Ralph, as my wife had been a named driver on our original policy she was granted 60% NCB when we took the new policy for her out with the same company---------worth investigating,also the cost difference for her was minimal between TPFT and F.COMP[About £18 if my memory serves me correctly] |
Re: Driving other vehicles third party
Quote:
|
Re: Driving other vehicles third party
Quote:
I could have claimed for the damage as I was fully comprehensive, but what I couldn't do is provide my insurance details for the other car as the third party to claim against. In that scenario I would be the first and third party. The reason for wanting to do this was the excess was a 4 times more on my car than it was on my wife's and it was my wife's fault, so I wanted to claim for it on that policy. I was TOLD (that doesn't mean it's right!) that I wouldn't be able to name my wife as the third party either, even if she did have her own policy, as we were married I couldn't claim against her. |
Re: Driving other vehicles third party
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.