Re: No gossip?
 

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:u...keith-moon.jpg

:p

Re: No gossip?
 

Re: No gossip?
 

Re: No gossip?
 

Witty and within the U rating, unlike the post that triggered it IMO.

Re: No gossip?
 

Yeh-----------but not as funny;)

Re: No gossip?
 

So would anyone batter an eyelid if it were Bart Simpson?
http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/simpsons/bart_mooning.gif

Re: No gossip?
 

http://www.solarnavigator.net/music/...eeky_girls.jpg




Two cheeky's make an ar5e don't they?

Re: No gossip?
 

Even Mario cartoon characters have been deemed as U-rated before now so in answer to the Bart Simpson character, Yes. Not my idea of U-rating but our moderators. Some people can't distinguish between comedy and porn.The use of expletives shown by asterisks is just as bad, showing bad taste and lack of vocabulary,but permitted openly throughout the forum.
The values as to U-rating seems to vary between moderators and this is why there seems to be an inconsistency.
Some words commonly used in everyday language i.e. **** and **** are deemed unfit but I can't see the difference between **** and **** when everybody who reads it knows exactly what it means,as in ---He came off and went skidding along on his **** ,or should I say posterior.
Even spell check allows **** as it comes after shat

The form put in the asterisks not me

Re: No gossip?
 

It's a privately owned site, if you don't agree with the way it's run then buy some computer hardware, and start up your own site.......
You've been on this site for how long Mac? You should know by now what will happen.....

Re: No gossip?
 

Am I bovvered----------have I complained, or just brought a subject to the fore?.
I have never complained about pictorial posts apart from using them as a comparison.