![]() |
Re: London Architecture
Quote:
For things like the Gherkin or Lloyds, you have to turn up very early as the queue sizes become insane! |
Re: London Architecture
Quote:
Picture please, you've got me very curious if the picture i have in my mind is close to the reality or not. |
Re: London Architecture
Quote:
|
I saw the inside of Lloyds a while ago. The desks are so small!
|
That's a bit of a bugger, would love to take my 13 year old daughter to this, she want's to be an architect and is obsessed by buildings, old and new.
Trouble is we're off sailing that weekend. Nutty x |
Quote:
Theres a charge for these as theyre guided tours [£18.50 adult/£13 student] but if its something she wants to do then that may be an option. http://www.londonopenhouse.org/openh...ure_tours.html may be of interest. :D |
Isn't it in the lloyds building they have a "Victorian" style room transplanted from another building ?
I think I saw it on a Fred Dibnah program once. I think St Pancras Station is one of my faves in London (The original Barlow bit) |
Quote:
http://www.lloyds.com/About_Us/Histo..._Adam_Room.htm |
One of my favs in the city is the Gherkin. Still the most unusual there is, well other than the lloyds building across the road.
I worked in the Docklands for a few months, and its like working in a film set. Its all glass and steel with a smattering of marble thrown in for good measure. You stand outside No1 Canada sq, and yo sort of expect a hover car to go by. I always wanted wot work in docklands, now i have, i dont want to go back. It has no soul as a place. Its too clinical. The view form the top floor of there though is worth a trip. There are some faboulos buildings in the city though. |
I wrote a big post on this last night and it's not here :? I bet I've attached it onto some other post, in a bizarre off-topic brain-fart.
I'm not really an architecture lover, but whenever I'm down in London I try and check out at least one new Wren church, such a variety... Perfect blend of form and function, they're gorgeous buildings that still work perfectly after 300 years. Say that of Canary Wharf :) But they're all so different as well. It turns out religion does have some uses... Can you imagine anyone building St Paul's without that sort of inspiration? Even today, that dome wouldn't be easy to put up, but it was built pretty much at the same time as the invention of the steam engine, the creation of the theory of gravity... (that's maybe how they did it, gravity being new was easy to avoid). I also like the way they stick out of totally rebuilt areas- totally nondecript concrete blocks, of no interest whatsoever suddenly give way to these perfect buildings. And then you remember he built 57 of the things, including St Paul's, plus other buildings and the Monument, in 30 years. Loads were built with no spires, but designed to take them later, just to get the buildings up- you'd think that'd look obvious but on most you can't even guess that they weren't original. But I really love this one... http://www.casebook.org/images/londi...istchurch2.jpg Hawksmoor's Christchurch in Spitalfield. One of Wren's students... There's a theory that Hawksmoor was a cabalist or satanist, mainly because this particular church is just so unsettling... Me, I'd say he wanted sinners to p*** themselves with fear. The thing just looms... Even more so now it's in a modern street. From 3 sides, it's a perfectly normal building, but whenever you approach the spire it seems like it's about to come down on you. Supposedly the inside's much the same, the whole place is designed to make you feel small and at God's mercy. http://intranet.arc.miami.edu/rjohn/...urch_small.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.