![]() |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
Of course, strictly speaking, you don't have to comply with Wiring Regs, as they're only a standard, not a statutory instrument. However, you do have to comply with Building Regs. Part P is most dominant section and you may struggle to get a LA Completion Certificate for a DIY electrical installation that doesn't comply with the Regs? I agree about the cost point : Part P has added a lot of cost for little functional benefit in many cases |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Or do it yourself safely and disconnect it if/when you want to sell the house.
When you say running tools off it, are you meaning a little electric drill, or a 200amp welding set? |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
You're right about 2 RCDs in line, unless the upsteam one (nearer source) is time delayed to maintain discrimination. |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
1 Attachment(s)
found this for ya.
|
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
Thanks to everyone for the required information regarding this update, and it has been pretty valuable. I think the safest way would be to speak to a local "sparky" then move forward with a radial circuit for my requirements. |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
17th edition regs state that all circuits have to be RCD'd and not throught the main switch unless on a TT earthing system where the main switch will have a time delay.
your case you will prob's have a a TN-S system which means a new board in the house with a RCD for all circuit and the Garage circuit being on a time delay RCBO type C 30A disconnection with a 30mA trip. The garage board should be an RCD main swtich with a 6A lighting circuit and a 20A radial circuit for the sockets, wire in 2.5mm for the sockets, the external socket wont need a fused connection unit if you want it wired directly onto the radial circuit. lighting you can use 1.0mm twin or 1.5mm twin. the main house board will need an rcd before running the cable to garage by most council standards as it changes from council to council, most sparkys wont install it without an rcd in the main house. i am a fully qualified sparky without all the being able to fill then certs in atm but noone asks for certs tbh. |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
|
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
Quote:
Note to self - get properly to grips with the 17th Edition! Quote:
|
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
1. The two units you link seem to be equivalent offerings from different manufacturers. Personally, I would buy the MK version, as I believe MK (and also Crabtree) are superior and worth the extra money. Either would be suitable for your application (Final ccts: 1 way lighting, 1 way power) unless you really want a separate circuit outside socket, which creates hassle fom a Part P standpoint. 2. In my opinion, I would upgrade the main consumer unit in the house first. This supplies everything electrical in your house, so it is a better safety investment to get rid of the rewireable board. It is a Part P notifiable job though, so you really ought to get a cert from somewhere. Perhaps best to employ a decent spark as it will probably be cheaper than trying to deal with LA directly anyway. A question for you though. Do you really need to replace the whole garage system, or is an addition/alteration a better proposition? Might be more straightforward to carry out and also probably Part P non-notifiable |
Re: Garage Electrics, Consumer Unit - Which One?
Quote:
Quote:
I just wanted to tidy it up a little, and from the Periodic Inspection Report (IPM30) carried out last year, the electrician recommended for the electrics in this location to be improved to the current standards. I just wanted to do replace the garage power 1st due to the cost being considerably cheaper than changing the main consumer unit. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.