![]() |
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
Must be a new model! |
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
Loads of people blather on about it but none of them can give an explanation that holds water. On engines with a lot of cam overlap then adding some can increase midrange, EXUP valves etc. But there's a lot lot more to it than a simple case of flow and pressure. I think it all comes back to cylinder scavenging and wave movements. |
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
I could put the vid back up, but I can't be ar$ed. *actually you would! |
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
When gasses flowing it does some very very strange stuff. its all about expansion ratios really so i can see how you could get different sorts of pressure recovery within the system to make it more efficient. real world swapping exhausts depends a lot on the engine and the systems feeding it. |
Re: The makings of exhausts
We use hydro-valves on manhole installations, the idea is it builds up a head (back pressure) the increased pressure then causes a greater force to be applied to the orafice impellor. Once the water passing through has built up enough force to get the impellor to start turning it literally propells the water out of the manhole as a vortex, not only increasing the flow rate but also maintaining a constant flow rate once it reaches its upper limit. Thats up until a time when the volume of water within the drainage system no longer surcharges the unit, at that point the impellor will slow and the flow rate drop back down to an eventual trickle.
^^^That makes sense, because of the hydrovalve unit, so with no valve unit within an exhaust you get no such vortex and no increased flow - actually makes sense. Doesnt answer my question about making my arrow can a stubby though, am I likely to get a mid range bog by knocking off a few inch from the end can? |
Re: The makings of exhausts
thats different because its got the mechanical advantage of the impellor. what your talking about with backpressure in an exhaust isnt actually packpressure (although people think it is) its about restricting the pipe size so that the exhaust gasses are so fast they basically pull the next chambers gasses out alowing a bette charge into the cylinder (how i understand it) thus you can get better power. Increasing the exhaust dia slows the gas but allows higher flowrates so basically its a balancing act between the two. bigger bores allow more gas out (good up top) but smaller pipes help midrange but can restrict flow uptop).
Thats how i see it anyways. Im sure yc will set me straight. the thing is you then get into stuff like reverse megaphone type exhausts that try and do both. :) |
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
"what your talking about with backpressure in an exhaust isnt actually packpressure (although people think it is) its about restricting the pipe size so that the exhaust gasses are so fast they basically pull the next chambers gasses out " Isnt that just the principle of jetting though? Designed to increase the velocity at which the exhaust is ejected, not to increase the volume of what is ejected. I thought the key principal in automotive exahsuts was achiving the highest volume of exhausted gas, whilst also trying to balance it with a consistant flow rate. |
Re: The makings of exhausts
thats how i see it ;) volume is controlled by the bore size?
|
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
Also stuff like 4-2-1 systems vs 4-1s and crossover pipes to help get that scavenging effect at whatever rpm. Reverse megas are trying to create or change the pressure waves. But yeah this is why I say backpressure is BS because there's so much going on to describe it by such simple and misleading term. I'm not sure singles have the same things going on to the same effect. Not sure you'd notice much difference with a couple of inch off the can. |
Re: The makings of exhausts
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.