![]() |
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Quote:
|
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Quote:
*mumble* dry clutches *mumble* combusting seat units *mumble* |
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Quote:
Actually what is the advantage of a dry clutch? |
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
People only moan about them because they make a noise. It's when the clutch plate's tabs tap the clutch basket.
Dry clutches lose less HP in the transmission as they don't have the clutch rotating in a bath of oil. Most if not all GP bikes use dry clutches because of this. They are easier to service and also allow you to use fully synthetic oils in the engine. I guess becuase Ducati make their supersport bikes very close to racebike spec (or like to think so) they have carried on using dry clutches however the advantages above are questionable on road going machines. I have spoken to a few people who have had both the 848 (wet) and the 1098 (dry) and they have all said the 848 is by far the better bike. Make of that what you will. |
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Quote:
|
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Loads of full synth out there with JASO MA rating.
|
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
Furry Muff just something I had been lead to believe...sorta made sense to me. Obviously shouldn't relay information I'm not right about but I thought that was true info.
|
Re: Rear shock suggestions - I'm overwhelmed.
The GSXR750R slabby had a dry clutch (and 34mm flatslides IIRC), just for the power loss reason you describe. Also might save a bit of weight as you don't need enough oil in to get around the clutch, and the sidecover can be lighter.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.