SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum

SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum (http://forums.sv650.org/index.php)
-   Idle Banter (http://forums.sv650.org/forumdisplay.php?f=116)
-   -   Porn ban (http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=109280)

missyburd 30-04-08 12:16 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1494734)
http://www.explosm.net/db/files/Comi...o-her-GASP.png

Now illegal... I'm sure they'll be locking me up soon...

Ah so that's why I wake up with a headache in the morn :rolleyes:

yorkie_chris 30-04-08 12:17 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
Nah it's rohypnol that gives headaches, why do you think that I don't mind doing the cooking? :p

Balky001 30-04-08 01:11 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
has the Gov't really turned in to the Mary Whitehouse fan club? They are obviously trying to appeal so someone with this 'law' but who? Have they just raised the tax on soft porn and need more users or is the WI threatening to turn to the LibDems?? :-)

It must be difficult of MPs to vote this is given many of them have colourful activities themselves.

Any erosion of freedom and choice should not be accepted lightly by the public, whether you feel strongly for the subject or not. The bigger picture is people being taken to court for possesing pictures of a scene acted out whilst the courts and prisons are inundated with processing violent and anti-social crimes. Creating criminals for these offences dilutes the seriousness of worse crimes.

dirtydog 30-04-08 04:05 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1494744)
Nah it's rohypnol that gives headaches, why do you think that I don't mind doing the cooking? :p



:smt044:smt044:smt044:smt044

Flamin_Squirrel 30-04-08 06:49 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by northwind (Post 1494511)
And as someone else pointed out, they're talking about making it illegal to possess images of perfectly legal acts. That's obviously insane.

That's already the case in some respects. I do remember hearing of a young man being dragged into court for having a 17 year old girlfriend - not because he was sleeping with her, that was fine - but because he had naked pics of her.

yorkie_chris 29-01-09 11:02 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01...pron_law_live/

Bump.

Mr Speirs 29-01-09 11:04 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
As stated on another thread I love the headline:

Extreme Porn Law Goes Live... Are you ready??? Hahaha

SoulKiss 29-01-09 11:13 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamin_Squirrel (Post 1494779)
That's already the case in some respects. I do remember hearing of a young man being dragged into court for having a 17 year old girlfriend - not because he was sleeping with her, that was fine - but because he had naked pics of her.

Its the way the "penalties" stack up thats so wrong.

If Bear gets caught with his GF Flossy the sheep thats 2 months in prison.

If Hovis gets caught with a picture of Bear and Flossy getting it on, he gets 2 years.

WTF?

yorkie_chris 29-01-09 11:14 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
When they are making laws like this, how do they expect people to have any respect for any law?

missyburd 29-01-09 11:18 AM

Re: Porn ban
 
Wonder if it was a mainly female panel who passed the law :-P


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.