![]() |
Re: streetfighter or not?
Quote:
|
Re: streetfighter or not?
Quote:
This side of the pond, we were stuck with reasonably powerful (for the time) brit engines needing a little help in the frame department which begat combinations based on the Norton featherbed, which carried over into the Japanese era. I have no idea where the slammed busa thing came from, mind - everything I've read over the years seems to suggest customising is done to improve some weak aspect (yes, even the raked chops - they're optimised for cruising on straight highways). I can't see what aspect is made better by adding half a ton of chrome and a 300 section rear tyre, then making the headlight drag on the ground ;) |
Re: streetfighter or not?
To me , a streetfighter is an aggresive looking bike , urban and blue collar in character . The aggressive lines can be attained by opening up the rear end , which makes the rear look higher , and moving what you can down on the front end . Were i to try an "s" sv , i would lower the windshield line and install bar end mirrors , fab a liscence plate mount and lose the rear fender , and cut off the toolbox from the undertail . This gives the aggresive lines without changing the suspension . Pick ur own theme to get the blue collar bit . Judicious use of thin diamond plate , for example or as i chose on my sv , drilliing the heel guards. Above all , make it your own , and the compliments will come naturally , but if u seek them in the build , no one , including most importantly you , will be happy . You would not believe the attention my sv gets sitting next to bikes costing twice as much!
|
Re: streetfighter or not?
Bottom line is, if you think you can define what a streetfighter is or isn't, you have no idea what a streetfighter is :D
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.