SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum

SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum (http://forums.sv650.org/index.php)
-   SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking (http://forums.sv650.org/forumdisplay.php?f=111)
-   -   Tank Spacers? (http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=134044)

JPBiker645 17-06-09 04:33 AM

Tank Spacers?
 
I was looking on e-bay and found a guy selling tank risers to make for more flow to the air box on a naked sv. and i would like to know if that would increase any thing at all.. they are inch spacers that go under the front two bolts on the tank... earlier today i made my own with two nine sixthteens inch nuts... i didn't notice any thing for loss or gain .... your words are apperacted

Dave20046 17-06-09 07:07 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Does your bike need more air? How's it running, what other mods have you got?
I'm not an expert but I'm guessing you'vee have to have the answer to those questions before working out if it's a good idea or not. No point giving it more air if it's jetted the same with a standard exhaust.

boo86 17-06-09 09:38 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
I run 20mm tank risers but I'm also running BMC race RS filter, micron exhaust, 8" stubby end can, 165 mikuni jets, etc etc etc etc.....

If you raise the tank without jetting up you may end up running lean. The result could be less power and more heat, maybe to the point of some intrenal engine damage. Always jet rich to be safe, twins like it rich too.
If you havn't got any other mods I wouldn't bother.

yorkie_chris 17-06-09 10:21 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Indeed. Pointless on a standard bike because the filter is the point of most resistance.

Dave20046 17-06-09 10:29 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1944170)
Indeed. Pointless on a standard bike because the filter is the point of most resistance.

When people refer to the 'snorkel' on the filter do they mean the lip around the top hole of the filter out of the top of the airbox?

boo86 17-06-09 11:16 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave20046 (Post 1944186)
When people refer to the 'snorkel' on the filter do they mean the lip around the top hole of the filter out of the top of the airbox?


I've got a large pdf file. by sv down under. If you post your e-mail and I'll send it over.

This'll explain everyting.

boo

JPBiker645 18-06-09 03:04 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave20046 (Post 1943951)
Does your bike need more air? How's it running, what other mods have you got?
I'm not an expert but I'm guessing you'vee have to have the answer to those questions before working out if it's a good idea or not. No point giving it more air if it's jetted the same with a standard exhaust.


no mods so far putting a slip on then a dyno jet kit runnong stock air filter ... the exhaust can is from our speed shop Rossier engineering its for a 450 yfz quad but it'll work, i'm trying to get every edge i can.

yorkie_chris 18-06-09 08:00 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JPBiker645 (Post 1945200)
no mods so far putting a slip on then a dyno jet kit runnong stock air filter


i'm trying to get every edge i can.

Errr, OK have fun.

There is no gain to be had from rejetting when you haven't changed the engines airflow. With a stock filter and a slip on pipe the stock jetting is OK.

You want every edge? You racing it?

flymo 18-06-09 08:13 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JPBiker645 (Post 1945200)
i'm trying to get every edge i can.

You would be better spending your money on good quality suspension. There is far more improvement to be had in the handling department than you will ever get from the engine on an SV.

zadar 18-06-09 08:25 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1945289)

There is no gain to be had from rejetting when you haven't changed the engines airflow. With a stock filter and a slip on pipe the stock jetting is OK.

bikes in UK jetted good from factory?
the ones in USA run like crap with stock jetting :)

JPBiker645 18-06-09 07:11 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1945289)
Errr, OK have fun.

There is no gain to be had from rejetting when you haven't changed the engines airflow. With a stock filter and a slip on pipe the stock jetting is OK.

You want every edge? You racing it?

wouldn't increasing the flow out the exhaust require me to re jet it .... wouldn't it lean it out?

no racing for me, just wanna make the bike at low rpms a little more snappy.

JPBiker645 18-06-09 07:14 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by flymo (Post 1945299)
You would be better spending your money on good quality suspension. There is far more improvement to be had in the handling department than you will ever get from the engine on an SV.

can i trade out a whole front set up from a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-636 ?

is there anything else that would fit?

yorkie_chris 18-06-09 07:15 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
What model?

JPBiker645 19-06-09 03:49 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1946160)
What model?


year 2000 naked

Red Herring 19-06-09 06:46 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
For the vain amongst us removing the snorkel and fitting tank risers does give a nice induction roar......

dyzio 19-06-09 09:09 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
[derail]
I've got a set of Chewy's raisers somewhere, if anyone wants them, give me a shout.
[/derail]

Sally 19-06-09 09:12 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JPBiker645 (Post 1946586)
year 2000 naked

He meant which model is the kwak?

GavinD 19-06-09 09:14 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
did you say exhaust of a quad . . . .

exhausts are very specific - try one designed for an SV

yorkie_chris 19-06-09 03:00 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Not really.
A slip on can type silencer is broadly the same thing. Obviously one meant for a CG125 might be a little restrictive. But, practically all of the cans on sale at the moment are 2" bore, roughly same length. Work exactly the same...

GavinD 19-06-09 03:06 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1947268)
Not really.
A slip on can type silencer is broadly the same thing. Obviously one meant for a CG125 might be a little restrictive. But, practically all of the cans on sale at the moment are 2" bore, roughly same length. Work exactly the same...

. . . if you set it up on a dyno to match with carburation etc

yorkie_chris 19-06-09 03:09 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
With a stock SV, there isn't that much difference in flow from a slip on can to the standard one.

And you try any can on the market, it will be so similar as to be not worth a jetting change against any other.

SoulKiss 19-06-09 03:23 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dyziowg (Post 1946767)
[derail]
I've got a set of Chewy's raisers somewhere, if anyone wants them, give me a shout.
[/derail]

Shout :)

JPBiker645 19-06-09 04:22 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GavinD (Post 1947276)
. . . if you set it up on a dyno to match with carburation etc


No need for a dyno tune ... the jet kit tells you what jet to use and any problems you run into it shows you how to correct it.

JPBiker645 19-06-09 04:25 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sally (Post 1946775)
He meant which model is the kwak?


i was just wondering what would work for my bike ... but thats a whole different thread no worries.

yorkie_chris 19-06-09 05:52 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Easiest is slingshot stuff, but SRAD isnt much harder and better kit.


Re. jet kits and stuff, there are generally no jetting problems just with a slipon can. So if you want to spend £60 on a jet kit knock yourself out...

JPBiker645 19-06-09 08:52 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 1947405)
Easiest is slingshot stuff, but SRAD isnt much harder and better kit.


Re. jet kits and stuff, there are generally no jetting problems just with a slipon can. So if you want to spend £60 on a jet kit knock yourself out...

now that we are completly off topic

Isn't a stock muffler much more restrictive?

yorkie_chris 19-06-09 11:08 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Not much more than the stock headers.

JPBiker645 20-06-09 02:58 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
really? all the baffles and such in side the can is more restrictive than a just a pipe? .....

GavinD 20-06-09 05:03 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
well yes - but the backpressure helps midrange torque

to get the bhp i got I had to put in injected cams (its a curvy), then do all the jetting, balancing etc

result 71 BHP and 45 ft/lb torque!!:D:D

then I had to do suspension and brakes to match!!

speedplay 20-06-09 06:02 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JPBiker645 (Post 1946146)
wouldn't increasing the flow out the exhaust require me to re jet it .... wouldn't it lean it out?

no racing for me, just wanna make the bike at low rpms a little more snappy.


Why dont you just change the rear sprocket?
Top end will be affected slightly but 0-60 will be quicker.

JPBiker645 20-06-09 08:47 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by speedplay (Post 1948014)
Why dont you just change the rear sprocket?
Top end will be affected slightly but 0-60 will be quicker.


I want to be able to hear it... I know thats lame but thats what I want..

speedplay 20-06-09 08:55 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JPBiker645 (Post 1948151)
I want to be able to hear it... I know thats lame but thats what I want..


Then put a different sprocket on and bung some playing cards in the front wheel..:rolleyes:

JPBiker645 20-06-09 08:59 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
nice but I allready have the can and jet kit wasn't too bad (60$)

How much are sprockets?

yorkie_chris 22-06-09 09:09 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Jets are about £2.50 IIRC. See why I didn't buy a jet kit...

boo86 22-06-09 10:58 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GavinD (Post 1947972)
well yes - but the backpressure helps midrange torque

to get the bhp i got I had to put in injected cams (its a curvy), then do all the jetting, balancing etc

result 71 BHP and 45 ft/lb torque!!:D:D

then I had to do suspension and brakes to match!!

I've got 72 with curvy cams. Only breathing mods and a slight ignition advance. It's cold up North though, that always helps.

GavinD 22-06-09 11:07 AM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
I dyno'd on a hot day - been meaning to redo it on a colder day to see what the difference is!

boo86 22-06-09 12:41 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GavinD (Post 1949230)
I dyno'd on a hot day - been meaning to redo it on a colder day to see what the difference is!

Aye, it makes a big difference. A normally asperated 4 stroke piston engine loses 1% of power for every 7C rise in inlet temperature. That's the reason I never run a burn crank case breather system. My sv uses a condensing system where the hot oily gas condenses then flows back to the crank case. It vents to atmosphere to prevent pressurisation.

But if your engine / crank case is breathing oily gas at 100C + into the air box your on a fast train to power loss.

It was about 15C when I dynoed mine. But it wasn't too humid, only about 30% humidity. As this also makes a big difference. Basicaly the more water in the atmos the less room there is for o2.

flymo 22-06-09 01:16 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boo86 (Post 1949297)
My sv uses a condensing system

Consisting of what? Is this just a set of filters on the crankcase breather hoses or something a little more fancy with a catch tank etc?

boo86 22-06-09 03:40 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by flymo (Post 1949333)
Consisting of what? Is this just a set of filters on the crankcase breather hoses or something a little more fancy with a catch tank etc?

It's the standard catch tank but where it normally breaths into the airbox it's blanked off and it has a small breathing hole drilled in facing the airbox. As it's filled with baffle it condenses and runs back down. I've never had 1 drop leak out of it.
It works great, no hot air into the airbox and the crank case can still breath no probs. No leaks, it's all good.

GavinD 22-06-09 03:47 PM

Re: Tank Spacers?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boo86 (Post 1949473)
It's the standard catch tank but where it normally breaths into the airbox it's blanked off and it has a small breathing hole drilled in facing the airbox. As it's filled with baffle it condenses and runs back down. I've never had 1 drop leak out of it.
It works great, no hot air into the airbox and the crank case can still breath no probs. No leaks, it's all good.


Can I be a pain and ask for some pictures of this?


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.