![]() |
2020 sv650a comments
Just commenting on some aspects of my new bike which seem a bit odd .
Pressed metal sidestand foot - sidestand feet are usually fairly substantial solid metal ! Bottom of rear shock absorber is nickel plated pressed metal - as sidestand comment. Rather vulnerable electrical connector and thin wiring under clutch lever. Plastic petrol filler cap. Still, it has a 3 year warranty so if anything fails ! |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Yes, the sidestand foot does look a bit flimsy (I have a 2017 Gen 3). From memory the shock lower is the same as on the previous generation SVs, so it's robust enough, and the clutch switches have always been exposed on previous generations too.
Odd that yours has a plastic filler cap, though, on mine it's metal. |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
The flip up keyhole cover is plastic, will check the cap again.
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
A side stand shoe should improve the pressed metal foot which is a bit harsh on my tarmac drive !
They are on ebay for about £10 (although from China which I would prefer to avoid ) The problem is elsewhere they can be several times that cost ! |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
I bought some bits recently and opted for a UK based address to avoid a long wait and worry of parts being cheap and flimsy. They arrived with the original chinese packaging on. The seller was just buying the cheap bits in and charging three times the price for them.
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
On the subject of 'made in China' , how many components on Japanese bikes are made in China anyway nowadays ? Or which parts of an sv650a do Suzuki actually make themselves ? Just a thought.
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Made in Japan was thought of as cheap and nasty at one time of course !
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
https://c-racer.com/store/bolt-on-parts/suzuki-sv.html
interesting ! |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
https://c-racer.com/store/pub/media/...ts_nmr7632.png
looks a possibility ! |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
https://c-racer.com/store/pub/media/...ts_nmr7637.png
plan view of same seat - wouldn't need the rack. I am going to make enquiries. Did over 140 miles on the SV650A touring around The Dales yesterday and the original seat is painful. |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
The problem with that picture is it makes it look like a horizontal seat which, if you look at their complete bike, it isn't. This seat is aesthetically different (though not to my taste) but I doubt whether it would enhance the comfort.
In order to remove the slope from the AL7-onwards seat, you would need extra foam which would raise the seat height. Suzuki have claimed the "lowest seat height in its class" by having a steep slope to the tank and then fitting a narrow seat with little padding. Earlier SV models had a two level rider/pillion set up which was, arguably, better since the rider's seat was more horizontal. Look at a picture of (say) a 2009 SV650S and see the difference. https://bikez.com/motorcycles/suzuki_sv650_2009.php |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
I found a pair of cycling shorts with the gel insert (a tenner from eBay) to be an effective solution to SV @rse-ache. I can do 2+ hour stints quite comfortably now, which is as far as you'd want to go before needing a coffee / fuel / slash anyway.
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
The c-racer seat is 30mm higher than the original Suzuki SV650A seat apparently, if anybody is interested.
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
|
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
Quote:
If I were to buy an aftermarket seat I'd go for either the Bagster: https://www.silverstonemotor.com/en/...dle-5367z.html or the Holeshot Performance: http://www.holeshot.com/suzuki/sv/20...etfighter-seat The guy at Core motorcycle seats (that did my seat) is a rider and will discuss your requirements. Having owned a Core seat for almost 4 years, I now know what I'd change if there's a next time. My Z900RS has the low seat option which means they took out the foam. :shock: Getting off the Zed and onto the SV is like sitting on a cloud (no, not cold and damp - soft). |
Re: 2020 sv650a comments
I've got the Suzuki "Tuck and Roll" seat, I think the general consensus is any improvement in comfort over the stock seat is fairly marginal.
I find it absolutely fine comfort wise and would rate comfort better than stock, but then I appear to be in the minority by having also found the comfort of the stock seat ok. Main issue I had with the stock seat was I found it too low and the "Tuck and Roll" option seems to add just enough extra height (somewhere between 5 and 10mm). I also prefer the look so was pleased to be able to pick up an immaculate used one on ebay for around half the new price of circa £200. Suzuki Tuck and Roll Seat https://i.imgur.com/Zu3PdgI.jpg Stock https://i.imgur.com/9z0KbEi.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.