![]() |
Home Information Packs
This is terrific news. The whole idea is half-baked, there have been so many u turns on matters of detail that the legislation is now incoherent, and very little research on the impact of the proposals. Sure there have been dry runs but they weren't in large centres of population. The plans are a complete mess. So this is very good news for homeowners. The best thing that we could do to stop sales falling apart is to move to the Scottish system, but no the government had to reinvent the wheel - and surprise surprise, it came out square.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6680131.stm |
Re: Home Information Packs
Mr. Ed(:) ) maybe then they should be consider a H.I.P. replacement?:rolleyes:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
mummy keithd will be pleased! she's in the process of moving and the thought of having to do this info pack was her giving me a headache...
|
Re: Home Information Packs
*twitches*
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Yep, bet the conveyancing department are relieved :) (Incidentally Ed, your folks not looking for a Solcase developer are you?)
As a first time buyer we were kinda looking forward to these, until they got nuked into oblivion and came out looking like an overpriced count of how many low energy lightbulbs the house came with :) |
Re: Home Information Packs
As you may know, Im in the same business as Ed. I have also been watching with interest the HIPs saga from the beginning.
He is quite right, whilst the English Conveyancing system could do with a revamp, what the Government have proposed is quite frankly a dreadful mistake, which, will greatly affect the Property market and in turn have a knock on affect on the economy as a whole. A delay to the proposals is NOT enough. The whole system needs to be scrapped. Something similar brought the Property market to it's knees in Denmark and is likely to do the same here. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Anything that may bring house prices down from the stosphere is a good thing for us 1st time buyers.
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
*wonders off to look at potential shares impacts* |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
Incidentally, the new legislation requiring rent deposit money to be held by a third party (tenancy deposit scheme) had an interesting little twist sneaked in - the third party is obliged to inform relevant tax bodies; that should stop a fair few landlords not declaring their rental income and not paying tax upon it. Of course, the net result may just end up being increased rents, but I'm kinda hoping that rents are depressed due to the huge takeup of (greed imho) buy to let mortgages. |
Re: Home Information Packs
I'm currently awaiting word from my solicitors that we've exchanged contracts to complete on friday... which was supposed to happen yesterday... I've been caught up in this chain waiting for the planets to align since the first suggested completion date of april 27th...
That homebuyers pack won't help things one little bit. The legal "dotting the I's and crossing the T's" will always hold things up... nevermind the people in the chain being as unreliable as they always will be... This system is whack. ... and I'm VERY short tempered lately... :lol: |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Right, I've heard a lot about this and then not really took any of it in as the missus used to be an estate agent so she knows more about it really.
In Lamens terms, I understood ( correct me if I'm wrong ): You pay approx £500 to get someone to check over your property ( a survey of sorts ) which helps give info to prospective buyers. If this is true, whats £500 compared to the amount of money changing hands in the property market these days. Does this not help propective buyers and prevent people from pulling the plug at the last minute due to some technicallity. Also why don't we adopt the same as Scotland when buying property ie: Accepting an offer becomes legally binding. Forgive my ignorance with the above, just my understanding of it all. |
Re: Home Information Packs
[quote=Ping;1193532]I'm currently awaiting word from my solicitors that we've exchanged contracts to complete on friday... which was supposed to happen yesterday... I've been caught up in this chain waiting for the planets to align since the first suggested completion date of april 27th...
That homebuyers pack won't help things one little bit. The legal "dotting the I's and crossing the T's" will always hold things up... nevermind the people in the chain being as unreliable as they always will be... This system is whack. ... and I'm VERY short tempered lately.. To be honest Ping, you 'hit the nail on the head' when you referred to "nevermind the people in the chain being as unreliable as they will always be.." thats probably one of the greatest problems in Conveyancing. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Ruth Kelly just made statement in the Commons. Apparently the HIPs scheme is being delayed for 12 months with the possibility of it being scrapped in its current form. Result. :thumbsup:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
It gets worse. The latest announcement is for HIPs to be introduced from the 1st August for houses with 4 or more bedrooms. :why:
If you ever wanted proof that this Government is 'as mad as a box of frogs', this will be it. Im absolutely astonished at the ridiculousness of this proposal. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
I made my solicitor bend over backwards arguing over things about the house. I got a fair few freebies for my hassles too :) Originally things like the cooker (in a fitted kitchen), the kitchen table (nice, and would be tricky to get out the door), the fire in the lounge etc were not going to be left behind. I argued, seller caved. I do just the same thing when shopping on the high street too. Not a dig at you guys on here who are legal beagles, but I was paying an arm & 2 legs for their services, so they worked for it (probably didn't help that right off the bat they weren't returning phone calls etc). |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
As re introducing it for 4 bedroomed houses, watch people who live in them remove a bed and convert the room into a study and claim it's 3 bed with a study but with potential for 4 bedrooms. No doubt the Govt thinks that people who can afford to buy a 4 bed house really care whether it's in in energy band C or D. Get real:rolleyes: |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
An eye for an arm & 2 legs really. :lol: If the client thinks you're not doing the job, they either pitch up the game & make you work for it, or get someone else to do the job. I'd put money on it that you're just the same deep down :) |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
I can live with waiting a couple of days for an answer to a question (for example, I ask you a question that you don't know the answer to, so ask the seller's solicitor, who asks the seller, then information has to feed back). Especially when the process takes months. I wasn't exaggerating when I said they didn't call/write, unless it was absolutely required for the sale to progress. |
Re: Home Information Packs
having bought and sold in both Scotland and England. I can say that the scottish system is so much better and easier and less stressful. selling in england was a nightmare. buyers offering and changing their mind weeks later. couple that bought eventually were scottish. contracts signed on thursday at 8 pm and I had to be out monday lunch time. had a whole house to pack by myself with only a 5 year old and 18 month old to help. moved up here and paper work signed 8 weeks before moving in date.
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
I dread to think what value a quick shuftie and light bulb count would have been to me - just extra expense for the vendor. It would probably be of more value to purchasers of first time properties to save expense, but even then only so long as it had some clout. |
Re: Home Information Packs
The HIP is certainly worth getting...you wouldn't buy a second-hand car without an MOT would you?
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
I don't see the similarity at all. The government is on the run, another stupid idea, they refused to listen to the RICS, they have ignored The Law Society for many years over legal aid, personal injury litigation, miners' compensation, all sorts of things so why should HIPs be any different. Ruth Kelly has today found out that it pays to listen and has had to eat humble pie. As for starting with 4 bed houses, it's crass. Why not start with 1 and 2 bed houses where generally speaking buyers have less £££ to spend and so energy efficiency actually means something? I really didn't think the Govt could make things any worse, but they have done precisely that. |
Re: Home Information Packs
I'll reserve judgement until I've read the full report in the next few days.
I still believe that it is a good thing. Anything that cuts out time-wasters and makes a positive impact on the natural and built environment can only be a good thing. I think there are too many people out there going on hear-say and putting HIP's down without looking at the facts first. As far as RICS are concerned, they themselve are training up DEA's and HI's yet with the same breath are trying to force these people out of the market. The system of HIP's itself has been used in the states and in parts of europe for years now and has been proven to reduce the money and time wasted in the home buying/selling process. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
The intention was sound but half baked so yipee for a delay, maybe it will flounder some more and give time for a decent system to come in. Something is needed though even if just to prevent Friday afternoon chaos of chasing building approvals ( people doing unauthorised work or never getting them properly completed) and so on and believe me there are many, many of those which very often end up with a seller or purchaser in tears on the other end of the phone.
The focus is too much on sustainability, though undoubtedly very important, rather than the property in general being fit for purpose and accordingly value for money. lets face it new houses by major developers will all be very similar performance (its generally only build quality that separates them, not construction specification). If you buy second hand you just need to know the age of property to align it with building standards at the time the only other difference is if someone has stuck a wind turbine or solar panel on the roof and you have choice between tow otherwise identical properties. HIP's should stick to making sure the building hasn't been illegally alterted affecting health and safety and the like. That could be implemented easily and quickly and would be very beneficial. IMHO:D |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
You can read the details here Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, agreed. But wind turbines and solar panels make little difference to the energy efficiency of a property. The fabric and heating/water/insulation systems being used make the biggest difference...so no, solar panels, PV panels, etc are in effect high cost low short term gain items...no matter what the salesman says:D Exactly! As stated before, part of the process involves checking these things and more;) |
Re: Home Information Packs
Jdubya, are you involved in real estate? I guess not.
It won't assist for the following reasons:
I could go on and on, but I think I've probably given enough info here. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
I find the tone of your post rather disturbing and very belittling and as such my response will be short. As you may or may not have gathered I am involved and have been for quite some time and decided to change from construction to train as an HI. No, I will never be a chartered surveyor...if I wanted to I would have done so after university. Now in response to your statements. 1. Yes, they have admitted hence that date change and the limitations imposed on the minimum number of bedrooms to 4. I'm not happy about either but that is because it is earnings lost to me. 2.Whether or not people care if their homes are rated and A or a G is irrelevant...it is a directive set out by the EU that stems from the Kiyoto agreement that all countries need to cut carbon emissions by certain dates. The UK signed up to the agreement so we have no choice but to comply and as such more and more people are becoming very aware about how 'green' they are. 3. Yes, the HCR is voluntary but how many people have a home-buyers survey which costs anything between £300 and £500 and is essentially a 'drive-by'? As far as the qualification of the HI is concerned...the HI is a level 4 qualification and requires a standard of learning at that level. (RICS are training HI's as well)I personally have done well over the odds regarding my studies over the last year. And just so you know, my indemnity and public liability insurance is arranged via RICS...not some company based in Gibraltar. 4.I dont know who will be doing the searches for the PP I'll be working through so I cant answer that right away. No, the HIP is not valid for a year, the EPC is but that is only an interim measure until such time as there are enough qualified DEA's/HI's to cover all areas. 5. Ed, I'm not too sure where you got your facts for this from but all of these searches are and should be included in the pack...it certainly is an excercise the HI needs to prepare and provide to the PP. 6.Yes, that info should be included in the pack as well. No, I cant see anyone gearing up to charge extra for it. Yes, delays may occur because of info not being readily available but that is the reason why marketing should only commence once the pack is in place...so the sale can progress smoothly without the wait during the sale process. 7.Wait 14 days? Who said that? Where? Once the report has been lodged it is made available immediately AFAIK. 8. The point is that people will try anything to get around planning permission. How much extra does a chartered surveyor charge for additional copies of their reports then? A lot more than £25! Thats why mate can drive round Devon in a £100K AMG mercedes benz;) I know there are flaws to the system but so do many things...including the current system of property buying and selling. At least the govt are trying to move forward with it albeit that they're being ****s about the way in which they're going about implementing it. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
Yes, the English Conveyancing system needs a revamp. The proposed HIPs WILL make matters worse. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
hAVENT READ ALL OF THIS THREAD YET, oops i stop shouting now :oops: but it interests me greatly.
But i just wanted to add this to the mix... the HIPS idea was one of the contributory factors to my leaving sales in the property industry after 15yrs of doing it. I even looked into the possability of becoming one of the home inspectors myself and had to sign up with the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister in order to be kept up to date about what the Govt were doing. Afetr a few "updates" from them i decided this was gonna bea dead duck and i didnt persue it even tho i was invited to attaend expensive training courses i was not qualified to attend. :roll: Whole thing has been a joke and how the hell do they think they can charge VAT on the pack??????? How does that count as a "luxury item" which is what VAT is added on for??? |
Re: Home Information Packs
The cost of a HIP = £300 - £500
The fine for selling a house without one = £200 according to the BBC :thumleft: Priceless I can see the long term advantages of having them for ALL homes, 4 bedroom homes only is pointless. I bought my first home at christmas and its 4 bedroom, yet its brand new with 10 years NHBC warranty so why does my house need one. Its like news car not needing an MOT for 3 years. |
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
Re: Home Information Packs
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.