![]() |
Baby born without cancer gene...
Quote:
or is there a whole can of them there worms being opened up here? hmmm... something doesnt sit right with me on this issue.... |
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
Sits very well for me. My wife is recovering from breast cancer, we have had 3 friends die of it, a further friend is in the process despite loosing both breasts to it, she has a little girl of 8, I have two daughters.
Anyone who has lived with this would never want a child to grow up at risk. Interesting in the article, the defective gene was in the husbands family |
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
I agree with Tim as we are going through similar for the past 3+ years
|
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
tim dont get me wrong of course its great from the POV that this girl wont develop breast cancer, my sister is recovering from 2 years of horrendous treatment so i can appreciate the pain caused.
maybe not so much the birth of this child and the story around it, its the whole "we'll make you live longer" philosophy....doesn't it go against nature? |
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
its sits good with me too, if the risk can be removed, providing there are no other side effects (time will tell?) then it has to be a good thing. although no member of my own family have suffered from it, ive seen the devestating effect it can have via a close friend
|
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
Quote:
If things like cancer are caused by "dirty genes" then without medical intervention these things would go away - people with diabetes would suffer the complications and as such be less likely to breed for example. I believe that without medicine, we would all be healthier - but only because previous generations suffered/had to watch loved ones die in horrible ways. My only concern is if we keep meddling, what damage will we do for future generations? |
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
I seem rather happy with it too...
|
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
Yes it's great that she won't get breast cancer but whats to say she won't get one of the many other hundreds of cancers out there? Whats to say she abuses the fact and smokes and drinks her life away anyway, in the end dying of lung cancer or liver failure?
The fact she doesn't have a breast cancer gene may well make her susceptible to other cancers/diseases, messing about with genes is a very dangerous thing. I don't believe this has been done to benefit this little girl really, more just to show it can be done, it will probably do more harm than good in the long run. Sorry for the pessimistic post, cancer is awful for all those affected, for families too :-( |
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
Quote:
they're not... the article said women with this gene are x% more likely to develop breast cancer, there is not one cause, and refusing medical treatment based on that assumption would only cause mortality rates to skyrocket |
Re: Baby born without cancer gene...
im not entirely sure who has children here and who doesnt, im not trying to get anyones back up, but i would imagine the people that have children would be more inclined to see it as a good thing...(i may be wrong!..as i often can be!)
the old saying..."you wont understand till you have kids of your own"..tis true!... if / when i have another..if its shown that the child could be at risk, and medical science could eliminate that risk..i would take it |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.