![]() |
Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Been reading a few threads recently and find myself wandering about certain bikes and why they appeal and the fact that I dont "get" the attraction
First off.. TLS I get the big twin thing. But why a TLS, it just looks like a big curvey SV, all the ones I looked at in my eyes had the potential to turn into a money pit very quickly and I'd want the rear suspension sorting out properly which = cost. SP1 Again the big twin thing I get, but I'm kinda averse to spending money on something that then needs a the fueling setting up properly and has a tiny tank range. 848 / 1098 / 1198 Dont get this either, looks like a jap bike and looks very cheaply made i.e. quality of plastics etc etc, and the fact it looks like Mr Blobby has done the welding on the swing arrm, sure as eggs are eggs I'd not want to buy a Duke with a wet clutch either. VFR, RVF ( NC30, NC35 ) 10, 15 year old bikes, b*stard to service, cost a fortune to buy as demand keeps 2nd hand prices high. Has no more performance than an SV and the one I rode ( NC35 ) didnt handle any better ( well felt like that to me ) than my Curvey SV did. So thats undoubtably put the cat among the pidgeons ;)... so go on whats yours... |
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Pointy SV.
I mean...just...why??? :) |
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
I don't get the whole Harley/Custom thing
|
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Any litre sports bike.
|
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Quote:
I find it strange that you havent put the Daytona 675 on there, well grounded, nice to ride but poor finishing and most importantly absolutely no grin factor or soul. So what do you like at the moment? nb650 |
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
It would be better if you added reasons rather than just naming the bike. Makes for a better arguement and more interesting read.
|
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
I wonder aboout the logic of the whole GSX-R 600/750/1000 for 'normal' usage ie not racing? I am keen to progress to a supersports next year but the more I think about changing my new SV (only owned a month but used to ride the supersports of the day in the late 80's/early 90's) the more I wonder about whether it is cost effective vs. fun factor of the larger engine sports bikes.
Let's face it they all top 150mph and get there in the blink of the eye, the mpg drops off a fair bit with the 750/1000 and they don't look massively different. Would be interested in thoughts/comments from others or am I just missing something?!?!? |
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Quote:
|
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Tall bikes with no offroading potential, eg Triumph Tiger, Yam TDM900, Suzuki V-Strom, that weird Ducati thing, etc - especially the Tiger. I see loads of them about but can't see the advantages over a Sprint ST.
They're probably not overrated, its just I don't understand what they're for. I'm sure I will once someone explains it :D |
Re: Overated bikes, or ones that you just dont get
Quote:
Its part of the Ducati ethos / soul of the bike to have the clutch rattle, it would feel to me like somethings missing. Quote:
Quote:
Dont get me wrong I wasnt intending to slag off other peoples bikes, just thought it would make an interesting discussion... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.