![]() |
Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
This was posted on the Ducati site I'm on today, explaining why he was late to the meet point.
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...posts/aaa1.jpg Very low speed drop by the sound of it but a broken frame anyway.. Shades of the early 595 (was it?) debacle. Was he just unlucky? |
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
oh, was considering a triumph for next bike, must have just been unlucky, would have heard of more otherwise?
|
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
:smt044, nice Pete, should get someone biting right...;)
Cheers Mark. |
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
still at least they had a good patch, unlike the duc's hey ;)
|
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
bloke had dropped it, but doesnt sound that strong does it :rolleyes: which bike was it do you know?
|
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
Was talking to m.c@etc. today, he works for a big(ish) bike shop in sheffield and was saying they're a nightmare everything get's sent off to trumph.
Ruining my dreams of a triple :( |
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
He can't spell "an" and the yoke isn't part of the frame. 1/10 for credibility. :-P
|
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
About a year or so ago there was some reports of gixxer 1000s doing this too - snapping frames at the headstock - but it doesn't seem all that widespread.
|
Re: Are Triumph back to their bad old ways?
Quote:
No idea how widespread it was as the recall was supposedly done at the service interval on the sly and only affected a small batch, that came from the dealer. I only ever heard of the one on the road and possibly a second that was a race bike but can't be sure as I'm not an owner. As for Triumph, no idea, this is the first I've heard of a problem with the frames. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.