|
PC hardware advice required
I am trying to spec a special workstation. I was intending to use the Dell T5600 range
Twin E5-2687W Xeon 3.1GHz 64GB Ram 3GB Quadro K4000 256 GB SSD 2*900GB SAS But my issue when i read the specs is the onboard controller only supports 3GB throughput. so is there any point in using the 10,000 rpm SAS drives over cheap scsi? Perhaps a little improvement on disc latency/seek. But throughput is compromised by this on board controller. At over 7 grand I should be expecting a monster. The system is to be used for initial testing of a hydrodynamic simulation. We have a beast to do the real work. |
Re: PC hardware advice required
To answer my own question, if I choose the right option it comes with a perc h310 that does support 6GB.
|
Re: PC hardware advice required
the higher the spin speed the quicker the read and seek speed. want it to fly then 2x 10k with striped raid should see your 6gb throughput. HDD's are the slowest part of any computer.
|
Re: PC hardware advice required
yes, I was confused reading the warning that the onboard controller was 3GB throughput. So opting for high speed drives seemed a waste with an identified bottleneck. But if it comes with the PERC H310 so no issue.
|
Re: PC hardware advice required
64gb of ram, that's nuts! What will it be used for?
|
Re: PC hardware advice required
To run a program call Fluidity for a student on placement. This workstation is a baby for this type of job. We already have a 128 core system that our engineers use.
But it scales right up to being capable of running on
|
Re: PC hardware advice required
Nice configuration. I assume you'll be using the 256Gb SSD for swap space since you've only got 64Gb of RAM :)
But on a more serious note, depending on the size of your models you might be better off with a couple more SSDs instead of using SAS drives. For small block read/write operations the SSD will make any physical drive look slow. The only downside is that they have limited endurance so be prepared to replace them in about 3 years. If you're doing more sequential access like writing results sets, then the higher cost of SSDs doesn't make sense, but you'll probably need to defrag/re-format the SAS drives from time to get maximum sequential performance. Just my (rather geeky) thoughts, Keith. P.S. Three SSD drives will probably saturate the PCI-e lanes to the onboard SATA controller, so consider adding an additional 8-lane SATA interface if you can find one. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
