SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum

SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum (http://forums.sv650.org/index.php)
-   Idle Banter (http://forums.sv650.org/forumdisplay.php?f=116)
-   -   3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg! (http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=207641)

shiftin_gear98 20-02-14 10:21 AM

3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
Random I know, but thought I'd share.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlG9w...yer_detailpage


Sorry no idea how to actually copy clip here.
Please feel free if you are gifted.

jambo 20-02-14 11:57 AM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
Wow.

That's a lot of swarf.

I'm reminded of a quote that I've heard attributed to Michaelangelo. There are various versions along the theme of:
"The sculpture is already complete within the marble block, before I start my work. It is already there, I just have to chisel away the superfluous material."

Jambo

shiftin_gear98 20-02-14 12:52 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
Yeah we were impressed - I work for a turned parts company, just not that scale!

yorkie_chris 20-02-14 12:58 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
Surely there's a more efficient way to make that than from round!

Spank86 20-02-14 06:43 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yorkie_chris (Post 2936452)
Surely there's a more efficient way to make that than from round!

probably not unless you fancy a cast or welded engine.

yorkie_chris 20-02-14 07:06 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
When we've made similar shaped items we've started with flame cut or water jetted plates. Albeit they took err #a couple# of trips between machines...
Still, probably a reason for it.

Look at around 3:20 the round bit on the chuck end isn't that big then have they swapped from holding od in chuck to using a face driver later on?

Spank86 20-02-14 07:12 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
I'd suggest the reason is simply that being able to use a machine lathe and do the job quickly is worth more than using a bit less metal.

I also suspect that the "wasted" metal isn't entirely wasted, there must be plenty of things it can go to that don't need the quality.

yorkie_chris 20-02-14 07:19 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
Recently done one, couple of steady rests (like the SLU on the machine in vid) except 2 of them back to back and used atling axi's... they pretty much just true up billets for oil and gas customers who make various down-holy type stuff... their scrap is worth a few hundred quid per 25kg bag apparently! No wasting that :)

The expensive bit isn't the metal that goes in the bin it's the machine time to hog it off, I bet that's probably £150/hr? More?

Then again, if it's fancy material sometimes you can't just buy it however shape you like.

andrewsmith 20-02-14 09:01 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
The components spec'ed for cutting from billet are aero and medical. Its something to do with the crystal structure of the material

Metal Spinning produces silly amounts of swarf (scrap man was the 3rd biggest customer at local plant) and it produces a higher tolerance part over a cast and machine finished part

Bluepete 20-02-14 09:10 PM

Re: 3.5 tonne lump - down to 67kg!
 
I couldn't believe just how much the tool could take off in one pass! Those pieces of swarf were proper chunky hunks! The power of that thing is awesome.

Pete ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.