![]() |
Abreast of the times.
Possibly just skirting under the "U" cert radar. I found this little article rather interesting.
I love the fact that one of my fave terms "puppies" was used. :) I am a fan of natural no matter the size or form myself,and you? http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...546467,00.html * I will understand if the powers that be decide this thread possibly beyond the acceptable limits* :wink: |
Re: Abreast of the times.
Quote:
|
Re: Abreast of the times.
Quote:
|
What spidey said... he should know, dirty little grouper he is...
|
Not my fault the female form is just so damn tactile is it? :D
|
Re: Abreast of the times.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
"4% said that their girlfriends would not let them."
Sorry, that just made me giggle. I have to agree with the reports findings, and spidey to a certain extent. Fake is a big no-no, just as is TOO large natural. But maybe a little more than a handful, and I'm not saying I have small hands. |
Yup, its true. Dont like them fake - looks too top heavy when their new, and when its a few years down the line, and the forces of gravity....urgh...
Matt |
I don't like 'em either... Well, that's not right, I like them less than proper ones :) They never look right, they definately never feel right... Funny, I'm the same with heavy makeup, I'd sooner see real skin.
However, should you be an attractive SV650.org female, and equipped with rubber bosoms, this is a preference rather than an absolute no ;) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.