My point was intended to play devils advocate, and my final comment was also put in to really pass comment on society in general - if it doesn't affect you personnaly, then the "I'm alright Jack" attitude tends to surface.
Biking and being murdered are very different though, (that the person being murdered has no choice in the matter), but I see your point. How far does / should the nanny state go?
I am sure if I said that the murdered girl should have lerarned karate or something, then everyone would also be up in arms!
I am all for freedon of personal choice, and I don't like the nanny state we are living in as much as the next person. But what if someones life could be saved? Is it worth banning extreme material? Even for just one life? That was the point I was making, although I fear I am not possible expressing myself to well today.
