Quote:
Originally Posted by Camel
I am all for freedon of personal choice, and I don't like the nanny state we are living in as much as the next person. But what if someones life could be saved? Is it worth banning extreme material? Even for just one life? That was the point I was making, although I fear I am not possible expressing myself to well today.  |
I feel your point might be contradictory, maybe ive miss interpreted it. You cant have freedom and protection of the individual, they are mutually exclusive if you are talking about only 1 life.
I should be able to take what ever drugs I want, then go for a sky jump, if i feel fit. none of my actions will have a direct effect on anyone. But the 'nanny state' state interfears in an attempt to preseve my life. But I argue, that the state does not have a right to interfear in this.