Quote:
Originally Posted by cartwrim
The article says the following will be illegal;
- An act which threatens or appears to threaten a person's life
- An act which results in or appears to result in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals
- An act which involves or appears to involve sexual interference with a human corpse
- A person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal
Can anyone on here honestly say that the depiction of these things should remain legal? What is a good reason to allow these things to continue? Why would people want to watch these things? |
Its called freedom and the right for an individual to make choices based on their own values, not those imposed upon them.
The main thing that bothers me is that possesion of images of the above carries a stiffer (ooo-er missus) penalty than actually doing it, which even if you think that non of the above should be legal to possess images of, SHOULD worry you.
Its like bringing a law in saying that there is no change to the penalties for speeding, (3pts, fine etc) but if you have a youtube clip of someone speeding you can go to prison.
Thats whats intrinsically wrong.
Personally what 2 (or more) people want to do in private (or with a consenting audience) is up to those involved, NOT the government, and if they, want to record it in pictures or on video, then thats fine with me.