Quote:
Originally Posted by carty
A year minus 8 weeks wasn't it?!
|
Ah, was it? If it terminates on a total loss then that's still time on cover that you've lost (this isn't the same as the insurance period argument earlier just in case someone asks lol). I guess I'm just saying, the payout seems pretty good, but it could be an illusion that it's turned out better than not having crashed/claimed...when you factor in the need to re-cover 44 weeks, and the premium increase (not over the previous year, but over what would have been otherwise paid) - and that's for 3 years too...